0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Emerging investigator series: microplastic sources, fate, toxicity, detection, and interactions with micropollutants in aquatic ecosystems – a review of reviews

Environmental Science Processes & Impacts 2022 59 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mohamed Ateia Mohamed Ateia Mohamed Ateia Gamze Ersan, Mohamed Ateia Mohamed Ateia Mohamed Ateia Tanju Karanfil, Mohamed Gar Alalm, Mohamed Ateia Tanju Karanfil, Daria C. Boffito, Mohamed Gar Alalm, Mohamed Gar Alalm, Tanju Karanfil, Tanju Karanfil, Tanju Karanfil, Tanju Karanfil, Tanju Karanfil, Tanju Karanfil, Mohamed Ateia

Summary

This comprehensive review of reviews analyzed hundreds of studies on microplastic sources, fate, toxicity, and interactions with other pollutants in aquatic ecosystems. Researchers found contradictions among existing studies and emphasized the critical need to standardize methods for microplastic characterization to improve comparability and reproducibility of research.

Study Type Environmental

Hundreds of review studies have been published focusing on microplastics (MPs) and their environmental impacts. With the microbiota colonization of MPs being firmly established, MPs became an important carrier for contaminants to step inside the food web all the way up to humans. Thus, the continuous feed of MPs into the ecosystem has sparked a multitude of scientific concerns about their toxicity, characterization, and interactions with microorganisms and other contaminants. The reports of common subthemes have agreed about many findings and research gaps but also showed contradictions about others. To unravel these equivocal conflicts, we herein compile all the major findings and analyze the paramount discrepancies among these review papers. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed all the highlights, research gaps, concerns, and future needs. The covered focus areas of MPs' literature include the sources, occurrence, fate, existence, and removal in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), toxicity, interaction with microbiota, sampling, characterization, data quality, and interaction with other co-contaminants. This study reveals that many mechanisms of MPs' behavior in aquatic environments like degradation and interaction with microbiota are yet to be comprehended. Furthermore, we emphasize the critical need to standardize methods and parameters for MP characterization to improve the comparability and reproducibility of the incoming research.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper