0
Review Tier 2 Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Emerging investigator series: microplastic sources, fate, toxicity, detection, and interactions with micropollutants in aquatic ecosystems – a review of reviews

Environmental Science Processes & Impacts 2022 59 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This comprehensive review of reviews analyzed hundreds of studies on microplastic sources, fate, toxicity, and interactions with other pollutants in aquatic ecosystems. Researchers found contradictions among existing studies and emphasized the critical need to standardize methods for microplastic characterization to improve comparability and reproducibility of research.

Study Type Environmental

Hundreds of review studies have been published focusing on microplastics (MPs) and their environmental impacts. With the microbiota colonization of MPs being firmly established, MPs became an important carrier for contaminants to step inside the food web all the way up to humans. Thus, the continuous feed of MPs into the ecosystem has sparked a multitude of scientific concerns about their toxicity, characterization, and interactions with microorganisms and other contaminants. The reports of common subthemes have agreed about many findings and research gaps but also showed contradictions about others. To unravel these equivocal conflicts, we herein compile all the major findings and analyze the paramount discrepancies among these review papers. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed all the highlights, research gaps, concerns, and future needs. The covered focus areas of MPs' literature include the sources, occurrence, fate, existence, and removal in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), toxicity, interaction with microbiota, sampling, characterization, data quality, and interaction with other co-contaminants. This study reveals that many mechanisms of MPs' behavior in aquatic environments like degradation and interaction with microbiota are yet to be comprehended. Furthermore, we emphasize the critical need to standardize methods and parameters for MP characterization to improve the comparability and reproducibility of the incoming research.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A critical review of microplastics characterisation in aquatic environments: recent trends in the last 10 years

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review assessed current approaches to characterizing microplastics in aquatic environments, evaluating sampling methods, extraction protocols, and analytical techniques. It identified persistent inconsistencies in methodology and recommended standardization practices to improve data comparability.

Article Tier 2

Aquatic Microplastic Research—A Critique and Suggestions for the Future

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review argues that microplastic research lacks standardized collection and analysis methods, making it impossible to compare data across studies. The author calls for chemical identification of polymer types, whole-water sampling, and a focus on ecological impacts rather than just documenting presence.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems: Sources, Environmental Fate, and Policy Perspectives

AI summary Read the abstract

This review paper pulls together existing research on how tiny plastic particles (microplastics) get into our rivers, lakes, and oceans, finding that they're widespread but measured so inconsistently across studies that scientists struggle to compare results or fully assess the risks. Since these water systems are connected to our drinking water and food supply, the researchers argue we urgently need standardized testing methods and stronger cooperation between scientists and regulators to understand the real health risks and clean up this pollution effectively. The takeaway: microplastics are everywhere in our water, but better science-to-policy teamwork is needed before we can fully protect our

Article Tier 2

Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the rapidly growing field of environmental microplastic research, discussing the methodological inconsistencies that limit comparability across studies and calling for improved quality standards to support robust regulatory and scientific conclusions.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Aquatic Systems – Monitoring Methods and Biological Consequences

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the current state of microplastic monitoring methods and their biological effects in aquatic systems, noting that most studies have focused on measuring how much plastic is present rather than understanding its harm to organisms. They emphasize the urgent need for standardized protocols so that results from different studies can be meaningfully compared.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper