We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Response to Comment on “Comparison of Detection Methods of Microplastics in Landfill Mineralized Refuse and Selection of Degradation Degree Indexes”
AI summary Read the abstract
This is a response to a published comment on a paper comparing microplastic detection methods in landfill mineralized refuse and proposing degradation degree indexes. The authors address critiques and clarify methodological choices regarding their original study.
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCorrespondence/Rebut...Correspondence/RebuttalNEXTResponse to Comment on "Comparison of Detection Methods of Microplastics in Landfill Mineralized Refuse and Selection of Degradation Degree Indexes"Ying ZhangYing ZhangMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, ChinaMore by Ying Zhang, Yawen PengYawen PengMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, ChinaMore by Yawen Peng, Chu PengChu PengMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, ChinaMore by Chu Peng, Ping WangPing WangMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, ChinaMore by Ping Wang, Yuan LuYuan LuMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, ChinaMore by Yuan Lu, Xiaosong He*Xiaosong HeState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, ChinaState Environmental Protection Key laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China*Xiaosong He: Email: [email protected]More by Xiaosong Hehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-4848, and Lei Wang*Lei WangMOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China*Lei Wang: Email: [email protected]More by Lei Wanghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8193-9954Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 2, 1471–1472Publication Date (Web):January 5, 2022Publication History Published online6 January 2022Published inissue 18 January 2022https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c07958https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07958article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views1599Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (509 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Degradation,Monomers,Oligomers,Polymer particles,Polymers Get e-Alerts
More Papers Like This
Comment on “Comparison of Detection Methods of Microplastics in Landfill Mineralized Refuse and Selection of Degradation Degree Indexes”
AI summary Read the abstract
This correspondence comments on a previous paper about detecting microplastics in landfill sediments, raising methodological concerns about how degradation degree is measured. Scientific discourse on detection methods is important for improving the reliability of microplastic research.
Comparison of different methods for MP detection: What can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters?
AI summary Read the abstract
This comparative study evaluated several different analytical methods for detecting and measuring microplastics, finding that the choice of method significantly affects results. The authors emphasize that choosing the right method depends on the specific research question, and that standardization is essential for comparing data across studies.
A critical comparison of the main characterization techniques for microplastics identification in an accelerated aging laboratory experiment
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper critically compared the main spectroscopic and microscopic characterization techniques used to identify microplastics in environmental samples, evaluating their strengths, limitations, and suitability for different matrices. The review highlighted the need for standardized methods to improve comparability across microplastic studies.
Comparison of Microplastic Detection Methods in Wastewater Treatment Plants
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper compares different analytical methods for detecting and characterizing microplastics in samples from wastewater treatment plants, evaluating their accuracy, efficiency, and practicality. It provides guidance on selecting appropriate detection approaches for monitoring microplastic removal performance.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.