0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Comment on “Comparison of Detection Methods of Microplastics in Landfill Mineralized Refuse and Selection of Degradation Degree Indexes”

Environmental Science & Technology 2022 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Zheng Hao, Qianhong Wang

Summary

This correspondence comments on a previous paper about detecting microplastics in landfill sediments, raising methodological concerns about how degradation degree is measured. Scientific discourse on detection methods is important for improving the reliability of microplastic research.

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCorrespondence/Rebut...Correspondence/RebuttalNEXTComment on "Comparison of Detection Methods of Microplastics in Landfill Mineralized Refuse and Selection of Degradation Degree Indexes"Zheng Hao*Zheng HaoState Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China*Phone: +86882210; email: [email protected]More by Zheng Haohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-3544 and Qianhong WangQianhong WangState Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaMore by Qianhong WangCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 2, 1469–1470Publication Date (Web):January 5, 2022Publication History Published online5 January 2022Published inissue 18 January 2022https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c07391https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07391article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views1858Altmetric-Citations3LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (505 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Degradation,Depolymerization,Monomers,Oligomers,Separation science Get e-Alerts

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Good field practice and hydrogeological knowledge are essential to determine reliable concentrations of microplastics in groundwater

This commentary identifies methodological weaknesses in a published study on microplastic contamination from an informal landfill, arguing that inadequate descriptions of sampling wells, missing groundwater level and flow direction data, and incomplete sampling procedures make the reported microplastic concentrations in groundwater unreliable.

Article Tier 2

Comparison of different methods for MP detection: What can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters?

This comparative study evaluated several different analytical methods for detecting and measuring microplastics, finding that the choice of method significantly affects results. The authors emphasize that choosing the right method depends on the specific research question, and that standardization is essential for comparing data across studies.

Article Tier 2

A critical review of the novel analytical methods for the determination of microplastics in sand and sediment samples

This review critically assessed novel analytical methods for detecting microplastics in sand and sediment samples, comparing extraction procedures and identification techniques while highlighting the need for standardized protocols across laboratories.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of Conventional and Biodegradable Microplastics in Solid Sample Matrices: A Contribution to Method Standardization

Researchers developed and tested analytical methods for detecting and measuring both conventional and biodegradable microplastics in solid environmental samples like soil and sediment. Standardizing such methods is critical for producing comparable data across studies worldwide. The paper advances the field by providing validated protocols for detecting biodegradable plastic particles, which behave differently from conventional plastics.

Review Tier 2

A review of the use of microplastics in reconstructing dated sedimentary archives

This critical review examined the use of buried microplastics as stratigraphic markers in dated sediment cores, finding variable data quality and methodological inconsistencies across studies, and recommending standardized protocols to improve reliability of microplastic-based sediment chronologies.

Share this paper