We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics and nanoplastics: Size, surface and dispersant – What causes the effect?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how the size, surface properties, and dispersants of micro- and nanoplastic particles influence their toxic effects. They found that smaller particles and certain surface modifications can significantly alter toxicity, and that dispersants used in laboratory studies may introduce confounding effects. The study emphasizes the need for standardized testing protocols that account for these variables to accurately assess plastic particle risks to human health.
There is increasing evidence that humans are exposed to microplastic particles through contaminated food. Although suitable analytical methods are still lacking, it is likely that these contaminations also contain a nanoplastics fraction. It is known from nanotoxicology that particles may acquire altered toxicological properties with decreasing particle sizes. Particles can also have different surface modalities and functionalizations. Moreover, nano- and microplastics as materials with probably a relatively low toxicity are often applied at high concentrations in in vitro tests, and therefore the solvating agent, namely the dispersant in which the particles are supplied may have a major impact on the outcome. This might be misinterpreted as particle effect. Therefore, it is crucial to determine what causes the effect - size, surface or dispersant? In this study this question was investigated by applying established in vitro models for the intestinal barrier (differentiated Caco-2 monoculture and mucus- and M-cell co-culture) and hepatocytes (differentiated HepaRG cells), mimicking the oral route of particle uptake. A complex set of nine different polystyrene micro- and nanoparticles was used to elucidate the effect of particle size, surface modification and dispersant. Uptake and transport as well as biochemical endpoints were measured, complemented by particle characterization. The results show that indeed some dispersants can cause a more pronounced cytotoxic effect than the particles themselves. Surface modification and particle size show a clear influence on the uptake and cytotoxicity of nano- and microplastic particles.
More Papers Like This
Materials, surfaces, and interfacial phenomena in nanoplastics toxicology research
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how the materials and surface properties of engineered nanoplastics used in toxicology research may not accurately represent real environmental nanoplastics. Researchers found that surfactants, fluorescent labels, and surface modifications commonly applied to lab-made nanoparticles can alter their toxicological profiles in unpredictable ways. The study calls for greater attention to how particle surface chemistry and preparation methods influence experimental outcomes in nanoplastics safety research.
Health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics: key influencing factors, limitations, and future perspectives
AI summary Read the abstract
This review systematically analyzed how the physicochemical properties of micro- and nanoplastics — including size, shape, surface charge, and polymer type — determine their toxicological impacts across biological systems. The authors argue that property-based frameworks are essential for predicting MNP health risks and designing relevant research.
Recent advances in toxicological research of nanoplastics in the environment: A review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers systematically reviewed nanoplastic toxicology, finding that surface charge and particle size are the dominant determinants of harm — positively charged and smaller particles penetrate cell membranes more readily — and that adsorbed contaminants released inside organisms often pose greater toxicological risks than the nanoplastic particles themselves.
Microplastics and nanoplastics: Exposure and toxicological effects require important analysis considerations
AI summary Read the abstract
This review highlights that while microplastics and nanoplastics have been found in human tissues and linked to several diseases, the actual toxic effects are still unclear because researchers use very different methods to study them. The authors call for standardized testing approaches so that results can be compared reliably, which is critical for determining what levels of exposure actually pose a risk to human health.
Potential Artifacts and Control Experiments in Toxicity Tests of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Particles
AI summary Read the abstract
This review highlighted potential measurement artifacts and the importance of proper control experiments in toxicity studies of nanoplastics and microplastics. The study cautions that antimicrobials, surfactants, and other additives present in commercial plastic particle dispersions may account for observed toxic effects rather than the particles themselves, emphasizing the need for rigorous experimental design in microplastic toxicology research.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.