0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastics in the surface sediments of Krossfjord-Kongsfjord system, Svalbard, Arctic

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2022 26 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shabnam Choudhary, Kannaiyan Neelavanan, Syed Mohammad Saalim

Summary

Researchers found microplastics in surface sediments of the Krossfjord-Kongsfjord system in the Svalbard Arctic, with average abundances of 721 and 783 pieces/kg respectively, dominated by polyethylene and polypropylene fibres. The spatial distribution suggested that fragmentation during transport contributes to the prevalence of smaller particles.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Krossfjord-Kongsfjord system in the European Arctic has been assessed for abundance, source and distribution of microplastics in the surface sediments. The average abundance of microplastics in Krossfjord and Kongsfjord is 721.42 ± 217.89 (n = 5) pieces/kg and 783 ± 530.28 (n = 8) pieces/kg. Polymers like polyethylene and polypropylene are abundant in the sediment samples. Fibers are the most common shape of plastic particles. A high abundance of smaller plastic particles in the sediment may be due to the fragmentation of larger plastic particles during transportation. The microplastics' spatial distribution, shape, size, and composition suggest that the long-range transport by west Spitsbergen current and local inputs from anthropogenic activities are possible sources of microplastics found in the study area. Our results exhibit the presence of microplastic pollution, suggesting the influence of anthropogenic activity in the Arctic fjord and the need to control/reduce marine pollution which has become a potential threat to marine organisms.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic pollution in the surface sediment of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Arctic

Researchers investigated microplastic pollution in surface sediments of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, documenting MP presence in this remote Arctic fjord and contributing to understanding of microplastic distribution in polar sediment compartments.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in surface seawater of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Arctic

Researchers measured microplastic abundance, distribution, and characteristics in surface seawater of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, in the Arctic, collecting 18 samples with manta trawls. Microplastics were detected across all sites including the inner fjord, with fiber morphotypes dominant, confirming that even this remote Arctic fjord is contaminated by plastic particles transported via ocean currents and atmospheric deposition.

Article Tier 2

Anthropogenic particles in sediment from an Arctic fjord

Researchers developed two sampling designs to collect sediment subsamples from an Arctic fjord in Svalbard, finding anthropogenic particles including microplastics and dyed fibres, and contributing to the limited data on plastic contamination levels in Arctic environments.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and sources of microplastics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments of Svalbard, Arctic

Researchers found microplastics — exclusively in fiber form composed of polyester, rayon, and cellulose — in Arctic sediments from two Svalbard fjords, alongside polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, suggesting fisheries activity and textiles as primary pollution sources in this remote environment.

Article Tier 2

Investigation of microplastic pollution in Arctic fjord water: a case study of Rijpfjorden, Northern Svalbard

Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in the remote Rijpfjorden fjord in Northern Svalbard, sampling both surface water and the water column down to 200 m, and found widespread microplastic presence even in this Arctic environment far from major pollution sources.

Share this paper