0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastics vs. ichthyoplankton: effects of this interaction in controlled and estuarine environments

STUDIES IN SOCIAL SCIENCES REVIEW 2022 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Elizângela Alves Dos Santos, Ana Carla Asfora El-Deir, Jacqueline Santos Silva Cavalcanti

Summary

This literature review synthesizes 60 studies on the interactions between microplastics and ichthyoplankton (fish eggs and larvae), finding that fiber is the most abundant microplastic type in estuarine environments, that particles smaller than 63 µm to 0.5 mm have the highest ingestion probability, and that experimental exposure frequently causes increased heart rates, developmental abnormalities, and behavioral changes in larval fish.

This literature review exploring the relationship between microplastics and ichthyoplankton was conducted in the main databases available online, considering the period from 2007 to 2021. Sixty articles were found reporting the presence of microplastics in estuarine environments (71.7%), and ingestion by ichthyoplankton in estuarine environments (16.6%) and under experimental conditions (11.7%). The most abundant microplastic found in natural environments was fiber (55%). Environments with densities between 17.5 and 4100 particles/m³ exhibited greater possibilities of ingestion of these particles by ichthyoplankton, the smaller the microplastic particle (63 μm-0.5 mm) the greater the probability (95%) of being ingested by ichthyoplankton (>2.56 mm). Danio rerio (zebrafish) was the species commonly used to assess the effects caused by the interaction between microplastics and ichthyoplankton under experimental conditions. The effects frequently reported were: increased heart rates (25%); growth inhibition (25%); interference in larvae’s swimming speed (53.4%); and inflammation in various organs (e.g., liver, intestine) (50%).

Share this paper