We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reply on RC2
Summary
This is an author reply to the second reviewer comment (RC2) on the same Antarctic snow microplastics study. The authors address additional questions about their sampling protocol and analytical confirmation of microplastic identity in remote Antarctic snow samples.
Abstract. In recent years, airborne microplastics have been identified in a range of remote environments. However, data throughout the Southern Hemisphere, in particular Antarctica, are largely absent to date. We collected snow samples from 19 sites across the Ross Island region of Antarctica. Suspected microplastic particles were isolated and their composition confirmed using micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µFTIR). We identified microplastics in all Antarctic snow samples at an average concentration of 29 particlesâLâ1, with fibres the most common morphotype and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) the most common polymer. To investigate sources, backward air mass trajectories were run from the time of sampling. These indicate potential long-range transportation of up to 6000âkm, assuming a residence time of 6.5âd. Local sources were also identified as potential inputs into the environment as the polymers identified were consistent with those used in clothing and equipment from nearby research stations. This study adds to the growing body of literature regarding microplastics as a ubiquitous airborne pollutant and establishes their presence in Antarctica.