0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Comparative analysis of indoor and outdoor airborne microplastics in a school in Vilnius, Lithuania

Environmental Technology & Innovation 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Steigvilë Byčenkienė, Ieva Uogintė, Lina Davulienė, Sergej Šemčuk, Mehri Davtalab, Vadimas Dudoitis, Simonas Kecorius, Mario Lovrić

Summary

Researchers compared indoor and outdoor airborne microplastic contamination at a school in Vilnius, Lithuania over five months. The study found distinct differences in composition: indoor air was dominated by polyester and acrylates from textiles and coatings, while outdoor air contained primarily polyethylene and polypropylene from traffic and packaging sources, raising concerns about prolonged exposure for children in school environments.

Polymers

Airborne microplastics (MPs) poses a potential health risk, particularly in sensitive microenvironments such as schools, where children are subject to prolonged exposure durations. This study investigates airborne MPs indoors and outdoors at an urban school from December 2023 to April 2024, quantifying concentrations and characterizing morphology, polymer composition, and sources. Comparative analysis revealed distinct indoor-outdoor differences in chemical composition, source attribution, and associated risks. Indoors were dominated by polyester (33.0 %) and acrylates (31.1 %), while outdoor were primarily composed of polyethylene (48.6 %) and polypropylene (7.7 %). Source apportionment modeling identified textiles (31.0 %) and packaging (30.6 %) as the primary indoor contributors, whereas outdoor MPs were largely linked to packaging (46.3 %) and transport-related emissions (28.1 %). Morphologically, fibers predominted indoors (66 %), reflecting synthetic textile shedding, whereas fragments dominated outdoors reaching (up to 94 %). Statistically significant correlations between indoor and outdoor MPs profiles (Mantel r ≥ 0.5, p ≤ 0.001) underscored the influence of air exchange and infiltration processes. We present the first study in Northern Europe to characterize airborne microplastics in a school located near a high-traffic road, analyzing both outdoor and indoor air to determine particle morphology, chemical composition, dispersion patterns, and likely sources. • Indoors, MPs mainly originate from textiles (31 %) and packaging (31 %). • Outdoors, packaging (46 %) and tire-wear particles (28 %) dominate sources. • Indoors MPs dominates PES 33 % and ACR 31 %, outdoors PE 49 % and PP 8 %. • Integrated multi-attribute MP analysis introducing a novel hazard-weighted index.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Long-term assessment of microplastics in indoor high school air: Abundance, sources, and polymeric analysis

Researchers monitored airborne microplastic concentrations in indoor high school environments over an extended period, identifying sources and seasonal patterns. Indoor air contained substantial microplastic levels, with textile fibers and outdoor infiltration contributing to persistent classroom air contamination.

Article Tier 2

Long-term assessment of microplastics in indoor high school air: Abundance, sources, and polymeric analysis

This long-term study monitored microplastic concentrations in indoor high school air over multiple years, finding persistent contamination dominated by fibers, with sources including synthetic textiles and suggesting that indoor air is a significant human exposure route.

Article Tier 2

First overview of microplastics in indoor and outdoor air

This study provided one of the first comprehensive overviews of microplastic contamination in both indoor and outdoor air, establishing that microplastics are airborne and that indoor environments may have higher concentrations than outdoors due to synthetic materials and textiles. The findings raised new concerns about inhalation as a pathway for human microplastic exposure.

Article Tier 2

Airborne microplastics and plastic additives in a school environment: identification, quantification, and associated inhalation risks

Researchers measured airborne microplastic levels inside and outside a school near a plastics factory in Portugal and found that indoor concentrations were significantly higher than outdoor levels. Six types of plastic polymers were identified in classroom air, along with co-occurring pollutants like phthalates and pesticides. The study estimates daily inhalation exposure for children and highlights that kids may be breathing in microplastics throughout the school day.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics comparison of indoor and outdoor air and ventilation rate effect in outskirts of the Seoul metropolitan city

Researchers measured airborne microplastics both indoors and outdoors in buildings near Seoul, finding that indoor concentrations were 1.8 times higher than outdoor levels. Polyester fibers from clothing and furnishings were the most common type, and lower ventilation rates led to higher indoor microplastic levels, meaning the air people breathe at home and work may be a significant source of microplastic exposure.

Share this paper