0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Plastic Skinscapes in Tibetan Buddhism

The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 2022 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Trine Brox

Summary

This study examines the increasing presence of plastics in Tibetan Buddhist practice, focusing on three forms — acrylic shells protecting sacred texts, polyethylene jars containing votives, and silicone imitations of Buddhist lamas. Using the concept of 'skinscapes,' the author explores how the material and imagined properties of plastics allow them to be incorporated into sacred domains and what consequences follow.

Polymers
Body Systems

This article takes as its point of departure S. Brent Plate's (2012) compelling metaphor ‘the skin of religion’ to discuss the increasing presence and impact of plastics in the sphere of religion. What material and imagined properties of plastics allow them to be incorporated into the sacred domain? How are plastics experienced? What are the consequences of plastics’ increasing presence? The discussion pivots around observations of three forms of plastics used in contemporary Tibetan Buddhism: (1) acrylic shells protecting sacred text, (2) polyethylene jars containing votives and (3) silicone imitations of Buddhist lamas. The article focuses on the skinscapes co-constituted by these plastics, focusing on the affordances and enactments of plastics in the religious field, not only in terms of how acrylic, polyethylene and silicone are experienced, but also how they enact their material properties even beyond our sensual experiences of them. While the plastic materials protect and prolong the precious items that they contain or imitate, they also raise discussions about disposability, non-perishability, pollution and material doubt.

Share this paper