0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastics Determination in Gastrointestinal Tracts of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and Gilt-Head Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)

Polymers 2022 20 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Raquel Sánchez-Almeida, Cintia Hernández-Sánchez, Cristina Villanova-Solano, Francisco J. Díaz-Peña, Sabrina Clemente, Javier González‐Sálamo, Miguel González-Pleiter, Javier Hernández‐Borges

Summary

Researchers examined microplastics in the gastrointestinal tracts of 86 farmed European sea bass and gilt-head sea bream from Tenerife, finding that most items were colorless and blue microfibers averaging around 2 mm in length. FTIR analysis revealed cellulosic fibers as the most common type, followed by polyester, polyacrylonitrile, and poly(ether-urethane).

Polymers
Body Systems

Microplastic pollution has an extremely widespread distribution, to the extent that microplastics could be ingested by aquatic organisms, including species of commercial importance for fisheries and aquaculture. In this work, the anthropogenic particles content of the gastrointestinal tracts of 86 individuals of cultivated European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, n = 45) and gilt-head sea bream (Sparus aurata, n = 41) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) was determined. Samples were bought at local markets and directly transported to the laboratory. After the dissection of the fishes and digestion of the gastrointestinal tracts in 10% KOH (w/v) at 60 °C for 24 h, the digests were filtered (50 µm stainless-steel mesh) and visualized under a stereomicroscope, finding that most of the items were colourless (47.7% for Dicentrarchus labrax and 60.9% for Sparus aurata) and blue (35.3% vs. 24.8%) microfibers, with an average length of 1957 ± 1699 µm and 1988 ± 1853 µm, respectively. Moreover, 15.3% of the microfibres were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, showing the prevalence of cellulosic fibres together with polyester, polyacrylonitrile, and poly(ether-urethane). This pattern (microplastics shapes, colours, sizes, and composition) clearly agrees with previous studies carried out in the Canary Islands region regarding the determination of microplastics in the marine environment.

Share this paper