0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant growth, grain yield and quality, and soil properties to the microplastic occurrence in paddy soil

Journal of Soils and Sediments 2022 57 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Sen Chen, Yanfang Feng, Lanfang Han, Detian Li, Yuanyuan Feng, Paramsothy Jeyakumar, Haijun Sun, Weiming Shi, Hailong Wang

Summary

Researchers found that microplastics in paddy soil had complex effects on rice crops — some types actually increased grain yield by up to 30%, while also altering soil chemistry, nutrient availability, and amino acid composition in the grain. The findings suggest that microplastic contamination in agricultural soils may affect not just plant health but also the nutritional quality of food crops.

Agricultural soil has been recognized as a major sink of microplastic, an emerging pollutant to environmental biodiversity and ecosystem. However, the impacts of microplastic on soil–plant systems (e.g., crop growth, grain yield and amino acid content, nitrogen uptake capacity, and soil properties) remain largely unknown. Four typical microplastics, i.e., polythene (PE, 200 μm), polyacrylonitrile (PAN, 200 μm), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in diameter of 200 μm and 10 μm (PET200 and PET10), were tested to assess the consequent aforementioned responses under rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddy soil in a mesocosm experiment. Microplastics multiply influenced the soil pH, NH4+-N and NO3−-N contents, which effects were depended on the rice growth stage and plastic type. Overall, microplastics significantly decreased the soil urease activity by 5.0–12.2% (P < 0.05). When exposed to PAN and PET (in both diameter of 200 μm and 10 μm), there were significantly 22.2–30.8% more grain yield produced, compared to the control (P < 0.05), which was attributing to the higher nitrogen uptake capacity of rice grain. Meanwhile, microplastics exhibited nominal influences on rice plant height, tillering number, leaf SPAD, and NDVI. The amino acids were affected by microplastic, depending on the types of plastics and amino acids. This study provides evidence that microplastic can affect the development and final grain yield, amino acid content, nitrogen uptake capacity of rice, and some major soil properties, while these effects vary as a function of plastic type. Our findings highlight the positive impacts that could occur when the presence of microplastics in paddy soil.

Share this paper