We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nanoplastics: Status and Knowledge Gaps in the Finalization of Environmental Risk Assessments
AI summary Read the abstract
This review assessed the current status and knowledge gaps for nanoplastic environmental risk assessment, identifying critical needs for standardized detection methods, improved exposure characterization, and better understanding of nanoplastic toxicity across ecosystems.
Nanoplastics (NPs) are particles ranging in size between 1 and 1000 nm, and they are a form of environmental contaminant of great ecotoxicological concern. Although NPs are widespread across ecosystems, they have only recently garnered growing attention from both the scientific community and regulatory bodies. The present study reviews scientific literature related to the exposure and effects of NPs and identifies research gaps that impede the finalization of related environmental risk assessments (ERAs). Approximately 80 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were considered. Very few studies (eight articles) focused on the presence of NPs in biotic matrices, whereas the majority of the studies (62 articles) assessed the lethal and sublethal effects of NPs on aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Whilst many studies focused on nude NPs, only a few considered their association with different aggregates. Amongst NPs, the effects of polystyrene are the most extensively reported to date. Moreover, the effects of NPs on aquatic organisms are better characterized than those on terrestrial organisms. NP concentrations detected in water were close to or even higher than the sublethal levels for organisms. An ERA framework specifically tailored to NPs is proposed.
More Papers Like This
Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper identifies critical knowledge gaps in nanoplastics research and explains why they matter for assessing health and environmental risks. Nanoplastics are harder to detect and measure than larger microplastics, meaning current pollution estimates likely undercount total plastic contamination. The authors call for better detection methods and standardized research approaches to understand the true scope of nanoplastic exposure.
Environmental Toxicity of Emerging Micro and Nanoplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental toxicity of emerging micro- and nanoplastics, covering their sources, degradation pathways, ecological impacts on organisms, and the need for standardized risk assessment frameworks.
Nanoplastics: Detection and impacts in aquatic environments – A review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined nanoplastic detection methods and their impacts in aquatic environments, concluding that current analytical capabilities severely underestimate nanoplastic exposure levels due to the difficulty of detecting sub-micron particles. The authors called for standardized nanoplastic detection protocols to enable meaningful risk assessment.
Knowledge Gaps, Future Directions, and the Emergence of Nanoplastics as an Environmental Threat Pollutant
AI summary Read the abstract
This review identifies key knowledge gaps in environmental nanotoxicology — particularly regarding the long-term ecological and human health effects of environmentally persistent nanoparticles and nanoplastics — and argues that the lack of historical baseline data represents the most critical challenge for assessing nanomaterial risk.
A critical viewpoint on current issues, limitations, and future research needs on micro- and nanoplastic studies: From the detection to the toxicological assessment.
AI summary Read the abstract
This critical review examines the current methods for detecting and characterizing micro- and nanoplastics in various environmental samples, as well as reported toxic effects from in vivo and in vitro studies. The authors found that while substantial effort has been made to understand microplastic behavior, the scientific community is still far from a complete understanding of how these particles behave in biological systems. The review calls for improved standardized protocols and more studies focused on uptake kinetics, accumulation, and biodistribution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.