We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Surface water, sediment, and biota: The first multi-compartment analysis of microplastics in the Karnafully river, Bangladesh
Summary
Researchers conducted the first multi-compartment analysis of microplastics in the Karnafully River in Bangladesh, finding contamination across surface water, sediment, and biota, with fibers and small particles under 1 mm dominating all sample types.
The Karnafullly River, which flows through Chattogram and falls into the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh, is vulnerable to microplastic contamination. In this study, we looked at microplastics in the Karnafully River's surface water (5 sites), sediment (9 sites), and biota (4 species). Microplastic concentrations ranged from 0.57 ± 0.07 to 6.63 ± 0.52 items/L in surface water, 143.33 ± 3.33 to 1240 ± 5.77 items/kg dry weight in sediment, and 5.93 ± 0.62 to 13.17 ± 0.76 items/species in biota. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was found in the concentration of MPs in the Karnafully River's sediment, biota, and surface water. High percentage of fiber-shaped and small-sized MPs (<1 mm) were detected throughout the samples. Water and sediment MPs were often transparent/white and blue, whereas biota MPs were mostly black and red, indicating a color preference during biological uptake. The Bay of Bengal received 61.3 × 10 microplastic items per day. The feeding zone of biota influenced the level of microplastics, with a trend of pelagic > demersal > benthic > benthopelagic. Polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate were the most abundant polymer. Using the average fish intake rate in Bangladesh, we computed a possible consumption of 4015-7665 items of MPs/person/year.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Occurrence and risk assessment of microplastics in surface water, sediment, and biota of Surma River, Bangladesh
Researchers conducted the first comprehensive study of microplastic pollution across water, sediment, and aquatic organisms in the Surma River in northeastern Bangladesh. They found microplastics in all three compartments, with fibers being the most common shape in water and biological samples, while fragments dominated in sediments. Pollution risk indices indicated substantial contamination levels, highlighting the need for better plastic waste management in the region.
Microplastics pollution in aquatic ecosystems of Bangladesh — A critical review on research trends and future perspectives
This review found widespread microplastic contamination across all aquatic compartments in Bangladesh, with average concentrations of 4.92 particles/L in water and 118.40 particles/kg in sediment. Polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene fibers and fragments predominated, with freshwater fish accumulating the most microplastics per organism.
Microplastics pollution in the river Karnaphuli: a preliminary study on a tidal confluence river in the southeast coast of Bangladesh
Researchers found high concentrations of microplastics in the surface water and sediments of Bangladesh's Karnaphuli River, with downstream areas showing the greatest abundance, fibers as the dominant type, and polyethylene terephthalate as the most common polymer.
Extent and distribution of microplastic contamination in the benthic sediment of Turag river in Bangladesh
Researchers quantified microplastic contamination in benthic sediments of the Turag River in Bangladesh, finding widespread microplastic accumulation that poses threats to benthic communities and highlights a significant knowledge gap in freshwater sediment microplastic studies.
Microplastic pollution in the water and sediment of the Karnaphuli River, Bangladesh: An ecological risk assessment
Researchers assessed the spatial and seasonal distribution of microplastics along the Karnaphuli River in Chattogram, Bangladesh. Microplastic concentrations were higher in sediment than surface water and elevated in downstream locations, with fibers and fragments of PET, polyethylene, and polystyrene being the most common types, and the ecological risk assessment rated the pollution as Category I, indicating a significant pollution load.