We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
To pass on or not to pass on: The fate of orally ingested microplastic during cooperative brood care in two social Hymenoptera species
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested whether microplastic particles ingested by workers of the Japanese carpenter ant (Camponotus japonicus) and the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) are transferred to larvae during cooperative brood care, finding evidence that ingested microplastics can be passed from workers to brood. The study highlights a colony-level exposure pathway in ecologically important social insects that has been largely overlooked in microplastic research.
Abstract Anthropogenic pollutants contribute to insect decline in terrestrial ecosystems. Microplastic (MP), a major pollutant, is already present in all ecosystems and expected to further accumulate. However, studies on effects of MP on the ecologically important social insects are still scarce. In social insects, negative effects of MP could not only manifest on the individual but also on the colony level due to cooperative brood care. We tested whether MP particles taken up by workers of the Japanese carpenter ant ( Camponotus japonicus ) and the buff-tailed bumblebee ( Bombus terrestris ) are transferred to larvae during brood care. Both, ant and bumblebee workers, ingested MP particles with food. However, we only found MP particles in the digestive system of bumblebee larvae, but not ant larvae. This is likely due to the infrabuccal pocket (IBP), only present in the ants, that effectively prevents the transfer of particulate pollutants within colonies during cooperative brood care. In contrast, in bumblebees the unobstructed transfer of MP from workers to larvae may entail negative effects on larvae or carry-over effects during development. Thus, negative colony-level effects of pollutants on social Hymenoptera may be exacerbated in those species that lack an IBP.
More Papers Like This
The fate of orally ingested microplastics during cooperative brood care in two social Hymenoptera species
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed carpenter ant and bumblebee colonies to polystyrene microplastics and tracked particle fate during cooperative brood care, finding that ants' infrabuccal pocket effectively filtered particles and prevented larval exposure, while bumblebee larvae ingested microplastics transferred directly from workers, suggesting colony-level MP risks differ markedly by species anatomy.
The Fate of Orally Ingested Microplastics During Cooperative Brood Care in Two Social Hymenoptera Species
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists fed microplastic particles to ants and bumblebees to see how these tiny plastic bits move through colonies that share food and care for their young together. Ants had a built-in filter (a special mouth pocket) that trapped the plastic before it reached their larvae, but bumblebees had no such defense—meaning the plastic passed freely from adult bees to developing young. This matters because it shows some pollinator species may be far more vulnerable to microplastic pollution than others, which could affect bee populations that are crucial for pollinating the crops humans eat.
Trophic_Transfer_of_Microplastics_in_Social_Hymenoptera
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that tiny plastic bits (microplastics) get passed from adult bumblebees to their babies through shared feeding, but ants have a natural filter in their mouths that blocks this transfer. This matters because it shows some pollinators, like bees, may be more vulnerable to plastic pollution's health effects across generations—and since bees pollinate much of our food supply, their decline from environmental pollutants like microplastics could indirectly affect human food systems too.
Trophic_Transfer_of_Microplastics_in_Social_Hymenoptera
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists fed tiny plastic particles (microplastics) to worker ants and bumblebees to see if they would pass these pollutants to their babies during feeding. They found that bumblebees transferred microplastics to their larvae, but ants didn't because they have a special filtering system that blocks particles. This matters because it shows how plastic pollution can move up the food chain differently in various insects, which could affect the health of ecosystems that humans depend on for food production.
Trophic_Transfer_of_Microplastic_in_Social_Hymenoptera
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastics can travel up through the food chain in social insects, but this study found a striking difference between ant and bumblebee colonies in how that transfer happens. When workers of both species ingested microplastic-contaminated food, bumblebee larvae received the plastic particles from their caregivers — but ant larvae did not, because worker ants have a specialized filtering organ (the infrabuccal pocket) that traps particles before they can be passed on. This finding suggests that social insect species lacking this biological filter are more vulnerable to colony-level effects of microplastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.