0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

A systematic review of the potential neurotoxicity of micro-and nanoplastics: the known and unknown

Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2025 6 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 73 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kinga Vojnits, Kinga Vojnits, Morteza Mahmoudi, Kinga Vojnits, Kinga Vojnits, Andrés de León, Andrés de León, Andrés de León, Andrés de León, Kinga Vojnits, Julien Gibon, Kinga Vojnits, Morteza Mahmoudi, Philip Barker, Morteza Mahmoudi, Morteza Mahmoudi, Sepideh Pakpour Julien Gibon, Sepideh Pakpour

Summary

This critical review of 234 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics can reach the brain via olfactory translocation or by crossing the blood-brain barrier, where they may cause neuroinflammation, oxidative damage, and behavioral changes in animal models. The evidence raises significant concerns about potential neurotoxic effects of chronic microplastic exposure in humans, though major knowledge gaps remain.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Review

BACKGROUND: The escalating accumulation of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the environment has raised significant concerns regarding their neurotoxic potential in vertebrates. This critical review synthesizes evidence from 234 original research articles across aquatic and terrestrial models, as well as in vitro systems, to evaluate the impacts of MNPs on the brain. MAIN BODY: Emerging data suggest that MNPs may reach the brain via olfactory translocation or by penetrating the blood-brain barrier, potentially facilitated by biomolecular corona formation. However, distribution kinetics, long-term retention, and true internal exposure levels remain unresolved. We highlight that neurotoxic outcomes, such as oxidative stress, cholinergic dysfunction, neurotransmitter imbalances, and neuronal apoptosis, vary widely depending on particle size, shape, polymer type, exposure concentration, and host species. Nevertheless, inconsistencies across models and experimental conditions, such as mismatches between oxidative stress markers and behavioral effects or lack of dose-response relationships, hinder mechanistic clarity and translational relevance to human health. Notably, most current studies employ spherical polystyrene particles at supraphysiological concentrations, limiting ecological and clinical extrapolation. Interactions with microbial biofilms and host microbiota are largely unexplored, despite their probable role in modulating neurotoxicity via the gut-brain axis. Moreover, most studies rely on analytical methods validated only for microplastic detection, while robust, standardized approaches for identifying nanoplastics in environmental and biological matrices remain lacking. These gaps hinder accurate exposure quantification, obscure tissue-specific accumulation patterns, and complicate human health risk estimation. CONCLUSION: To advance the field, we recommend comprehensive physicochemical characterization of MNPs, adoption of environmentally relevant exposure scenarios, inclusion of diverse polymer types and shapes, and mechanistic integration through multi-omics and adverse outcome pathway frameworks. Addressing these challenges through harmonized methodologies and interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for developing predictive models of MNP-induced neurotoxicity and informing human health risk assessments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper