We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics in the continuous biofilm reactor: Occurrence, fate, and removal
Summary
A laboratory-scale continuous biofilm reactor was monitored for microplastic occurrence, fate, and removal over 53 days. Microplastics were detected at all stages of the reactor and were partially retained within the biofilm. The study shows that biofilm reactors can reduce microplastic concentrations in treated water but do not eliminate them entirely.
Abstract The occurrence of microplastics in a continuous biofilm reactor during the process over a period of 53 days poses a concern for the quality of the treated water. The aim of this study seeks to expand the knowledge of the dynamic of microplastics inside biofilm reactors by investigating their occurrence, fate, and removal. A 91.5 L continuous laboratory-scale reactor consists of four compartments, anoxic-1, anoxic-2, aerobic (A 2 O), and sedimentation. It was fed with raw domestic wastewater from a residential scale of the wastewater treatment plant in Bandung, Indonesia. In order to investigate the occurrence of microplastics inside a biofilm reactor, it is crucial to consider into account all treatment stages. The results showed that the abundance of microplastics in the influent and the final effluent were 810 MP/L and 10 MP/L respectively. The A 2 O process in this study demonstrated a high potential for microplastics removal from residential wastewater, in which it could be removed 99.18% of microplastics. The highest abundance was retained in the sludge. The remaining was found in the biofilm and in the final effluent. Microplastics less than 500 μm in size with the abundant microplastics types of fiber, and fragments were detected most frequently in the samples. Moreover, polyester (PES) and cotton were the dominant polymer types in the biofilm reactor detected by attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR).
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Wastewater treatment alters microbial colonization of microplastics
Analysis of microplastics and their biofilms across raw sewage, effluent, and sludge at two wastewater treatment plants found that >99% of influent MPs were retained in sludge, and that wastewater treatment substantially altered biofilm microbial composition, enriching bioflocculation-associated taxa.
Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants
Researchers tracked microplastic particles through multiple stages of a wastewater treatment plant, finding that particles were concentrated in sludge but that a fraction passed through each treatment stage and remained in the final effluent.
Microplastics removal through water treatment plants: Its feasibility, efficiency, future prospects and enhancement by proper waste management
Researchers reviewed over 80 studies on water treatment plant performance and found microplastic removal ranges widely — from 16% in basic primary treatment up to near 100% with advanced membrane systems — but a major flaw is that removed microplastics concentrate in sludge, which can re-enter the environment. The review recommends optimizing coagulants and sludge treatment to prevent microplastics from simply being relocated rather than eliminated.
Assessment of Microplastics Distribution in a Biological Wastewater Treatment
Researchers evaluated microfiber distribution in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor fed synthetic wastewater over 93 days, using optical microscopy and FTIR spectroscopy to distinguish natural from synthetic fibers. They found that microfibers predominantly settled with the sludge at a concentration ratio of 1409:1 compared to effluent, and that larger surface area within the reactor was associated with higher microfiber retention.
Tracking and risk assessment of microplastics in a wastewater treatment plant
This study tracked and assessed risks from microplastics through all stages of a wastewater treatment plant, quantifying plastic loads in influent, effluent, and sludge, and identifying which treatment steps provide the greatest removal.