0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Nanoplastic-Induced Nanostructural, Nanomechanical, and Antioxidant Response of Marine Diatom Cylindrotheca closterium

Water 2022 16 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Petra Vukosav, Tea Mišić Radić, Tea Mišić Radić, Tea Mišić Radić, Petra Vukosav, Nadica Ivošević DeNardis Petra Vukosav, Petra Vukosav, Petra Vukosav, Bruno Komazec, Tea Mišić Radić, Bruno Komazec, Cécile Formosa‐Dague, Andrea Čačković, Petra Peharec Štefanić, Cécile Formosa‐Dague, Darija Domazet Jurašin, Bruno Komazec, Petra Peharec Štefanić, Darija Domazet Jurašin, Tea Mišić Radić, Petra Peharec Štefanić, Petra Peharec Štefanić, Andrea Čačković, Cécile Formosa‐Dague, Cécile Formosa‐Dague, Cécile Formosa‐Dague, Krunoslav Juraić, Nadica Ivošević DeNardis Nadica Ivošević DeNardis Krunoslav Juraić, Nadica Ivošević DeNardis

Summary

Both positively and negatively charged polystyrene nanoplastics inhibited the growth of the marine diatom Cylindrotheca closterium during short-term exposure (3-4 days) and altered its nanomechanical properties and antioxidant enzyme activity. Growth inhibition diminished during longer 14-day exposures, suggesting the diatom can partially acclimate to nanoplastic stress, possibly through extracellular polymer secretion.

Polymers

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of positively charged (amine-modified) and negatively charged (carboxyl-modified) polystyrene nanoplastics (PS NPs) on the nanostructural, nanomechanical, and antioxidant responses of the marine diatom Cylindrotheca closterium. The results showed that both types of PS NPs, regardless of surface charge, significantly inhibited the growth of C. closterium during short-term exposure (3 and 4 days). However, longer exposure (14 days) to both PS NPs types did not significantly inhibit growth, which might be related to the detoxifying effect of the microalgal extracellular polymers (EPS) and the higher cell abundance per PS NPs concentration. The exposure of C. closterium to both types of PS NPs at concentrations above the corresponding concentrations that resulted in a 50% reduction of growth (EC50) demonstrated phytotoxic effects, mainly due to the excessive production of reactive oxygen species, resulting in increased oxidative damage to lipids and changes to antioxidant enzyme activities. Diatoms exposed to nanoplastics also showed a significant decrease in cell wall rigidity, which could make the cells more vulnerable. Atomic force microscopy images showed that positively charged PS NPs were mainly adsorbed on the cell surface, while both types of PS NPs were incorporated into the EPS that serves to protect the cells. Since microalgal EPS are an important food source for phytoplankton grazers and higher trophic levels, the incorporation of NPs into the EPS and interactions with the cell walls themselves may pose a major threat to marine microalgae and higher trophic levels and, consequently, to the health and stability of the marine ecosystem.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper