We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Wide occurrence of seven phthalate plasticizers and two typical microplastics in pig feed
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found seven phthalate plasticizers and two types of microplastics, including PET and polycarbonate particles, widely present in pig feed samples, suggesting that plastic packaging and processing equipment are significant sources of plasticizer and microplastic contamination in animal feed.
Plastics are widely used as packaging and engineering materials in feed processing, which leads to the potential contamination of plasticizers and microplastics (MPs) in animal feeds. In this study, the concentrations of two typical MPs, i.e., polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polycarbonate (PC), and seven phthalates (PAEs) as well as their corresponding monoester metabolites (mPAEs) in 45 pig feed samples in China were analyzed by mass spectrometers. Among PAEs, dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) were detected in all samples, and DEHP showed the highest concentrations of 8.26-2464 μg/kg, which accounted for 65.6% of the total detected PAEs. PET MPs (<MDL-302 μg/kg) were detected in 97.8% of samples. Meanwhile, mPAEs were also detected in feed samples with high detection rates but of much lower concentrations. A significantly positive correlation was observed between DEHP and PET MPs. This indicates that the sources of DEHP and MPs in feeds are homologous, mainly from processing and packaging. Besides, the significantly positive correlations between DBP/DEHP and mBP/mEHP indicated the degradation of PAEs to mPAEs during feed production and transportation. The estimated daily intake (EDI) of PAEs and PET MPs were 2.40-70.3 and 0.800-7.79 μg/kg-bw-day, respectively. The results of this study provided new insight into the first evidence of the co-occurrence and risk of MPs, PAE, and mPAEs in pig feed.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic Contamination in Pig Production
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed 200 samples—feces, water, and feed—from pig farming operations in Manta, Ecuador, finding microplastics in 100% of samples, with water source and feed category identified as key contamination sources.
Microplastics in fish meal: Contamination level analyzed by polymer type, including polyester (PET), polyolefins, and polystyrene
AI summary Read the abstract
Fish meal produced from wild-caught fish was analyzed for microplastic contamination by polymer type, finding widespread contamination including fiber shapes and diverse polymer compositions. The study raised concerns about microplastic transfer into aquaculture and intensive animal farming through fish meal used as a high-protein feed ingredient.
Microplastic Contamination in Aquafeed Ingredients Used as Protein and Carbohydrate Sources
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed microplastic contamination in common aquafeed ingredients used as protein and carbohydrate sources. They found that poultry by-products had the highest microplastic levels, with polypropylene being a dominant polymer type likely originating from packaging materials. The study identifies a pathway by which microplastics can enter aquaculture food chains through contaminated feed ingredients.
Microplastic pollution in aquafeed of diverse aquaculture animals
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed commercial aquafeed used for five different farmed aquatic species in China and found microplastics present in all samples. Microfibers were the most common form, with polypropylene as the dominant polymer type, suggesting that feed processing and packaging are the main contamination sources. The findings raise concerns about microplastics entering the human food supply through farmed seafood.
Occurrence, analysis, and toxicity of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics: a review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review focuses on polyethylene terephthalate (PET), one of the most common types of plastic found as microplastic contamination in food, beverages, dust, wildlife, and human tissues. The authors found major inconsistencies in how researchers measure and detect PET microplastics, making it difficult to accurately assess health risks. Better standardized methods are needed to understand the true scope of PET contamination.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.