0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

A neglected risk of nanoplastics as revealed by the promoted transformation of plasmid‐borne ampicillin resistance gene by <i>Escherichia coli</i>

Environmental Microbiology 2022 62 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xinxin Wang, Hua Li, Hua Li, Yu Chen, Xiaoqing Meng, Xiaoqing Meng, Mahlatsi Yorgan Dieketseng, Xinxin Wang, Hua Li, Mahlatsi Yorgan Dieketseng, Xinxin Wang, Xinxin Wang, Xiaomeng Wang, Xinxin Wang, Xinxin Wang, Yan Su, Baozhan Wang, Lixiang Zhou, Guanyu Zheng

Summary

Researchers discovered that polystyrene nanoplastics can significantly promote the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria, increasing transformation efficiency by 2.8 to 5.4 fold. The study found that nanoplastics induced oxidative stress, activated bacterial SOS responses, and increased cell membrane permeability, facilitating the uptake of resistance-carrying DNA, while larger microplastics had no such effect.

Polymers

Plastic pollution and antibiotic resistance are two emerging environmental and human health crises today. Although it was revealed that microplastics can serve as vectors for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance, it is still unclear how the nanoplastics influence the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Herein, we firstly compared the effect of polystyrene (PS) micro/nanoplastics on the transformation of plasmid-borne ARG, using a transformation model consisting of plasmid pUC19 (amp<sup>R</sup> ) and Escherichia coli DH5α (recipient). Due to its size effect, PS nanoplastics (10-500 mg/L) significantly enhanced the transformation efficiency (2.8-5.4 folds) and frequency (3.2-8.4 folds) of exogenous amp<sup>R</sup> into E. coli, while PS microplastics exerted no influence. The detailed mechanisms were found that nanoplastics induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, activated SOS response, increased cell membrane permeability and changed the secretion systems, thereby facilitating the uptake of exogenous DNA by bacteria. Moreover, the co-presences of nanoplastics with humic acid or Fe<sup>3+</sup> relieved to some extent, but did not completely alleviate the promoting effect of nanoplastics on plasmid transformation. Our findings suggest that the risk of nanoplastics on promoting the dissemination of antibiotic resistance should not be neglected, and further studies are needed to investigate such risk in complex environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper