We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Exposure to microplastics in the upper respiratory tract of indoor and outdoor workers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic presence in the upper respiratory tracts of indoor office workers and outdoor couriers using nasal lavage and sputum samples. The study found microplastics in both groups, with office workers showing significantly higher nasal contamination than couriers, and the dominant plastic types differing between indoor and outdoor workers.
The aim of this study was to determine the presence of microplastics (MPs) in the upper respiratory tract of indoor and outdoor workers, to assess the type and the extent of contamination. Sputum and nasal lavage fluid were collected, and plastic particles were quantitatively analyzed by polarizing microscopy and a laser direct infrared chemical imaging system. The polarized light microscopy results showed that suspicious MPs were found in the nasal lavage and sputum of both couriers and office staff, and the abundance of MPs in the nasal lavage of office staff was significantly higher than in couriers (P < 0.0001). The chemical imaging results showed that polycarbonate (24.2%) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) (23.0%) were the predominant plastic materials in the sputum of couriers, while polyamide (PA) (25.3%) and polyethylene (22.9%) were dominant in the nasal lavage fluid. The sputum and nasal lavage fluid of office staff were both dominated by PVC (39.1% and 41.1%, respectively) and PA (24.8% and 31.6%, respectively). Therefore, this study revealed that microplastic pollution was found in the respiratory tract of both indoor and outdoor workers, but the distribution of MP particles differed between the two populations.
More Papers Like This
Temporal Variations and Characteristics of Microplastics in Indoor and Outdoor Air
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in indoor and outdoor air across different seasons and found levels were similar in both environments, averaging about 1.8–2.7 particles per cubic meter. The dominant plastic type was PET, and turbulent airflow and human activity — not season or day of week — were the main drivers of indoor microplastic levels.
Microplastics Differ Between Indoor and Outdoor Air Masses: Insights from Multiple Microscopy Methodologies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared airborne microplastic concentrations inside and outside buildings in coastal California using multiple microscopy techniques. The study found that microplastic composition and abundance differed between indoor and outdoor air masses, with indoor environments containing distinct microplastic profiles, suggesting that people are exposed to different types of airborne microplastics depending on whether they are indoors or outdoors.
Impact of Airborne Microplastics on Induced Sputum of Urban Dwellers: the Role of Environmental and Occupational Factors
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed induced sputum samples from 25 patients with respiratory diseases and found microplastics present in all samples, with concentrations ranging from 6 to 500 particles per 100 mL. Active smokers and workers in occupations with high plastic exposure had significantly higher microplastic concentrations. The study suggests that airborne microplastic inhalation is widespread among urban residents and may be influenced by both lifestyle and occupational factors.
Detection of microplastics in human nasal mucosa
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastic particles were detected for the first time in human nasal mucosa samples, with polymer types and concentrations quantified, providing direct evidence that the upper respiratory tract is a site of microplastic deposition from inhaled air.
Microplastics comparison of indoor and outdoor air and ventilation rate effect in outskirts of the Seoul metropolitan city
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured airborne microplastics both indoors and outdoors in buildings near Seoul, finding that indoor concentrations were 1.8 times higher than outdoor levels. Polyester fibers from clothing and furnishings were the most common type, and lower ventilation rates led to higher indoor microplastic levels, meaning the air people breathe at home and work may be a significant source of microplastic exposure.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.