0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastic in oysters: A review of global trends and comparison to southern Australia

Chemosphere 2022 63 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rufino Varea, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Rufino Varea, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Nina Wootton, Rufino Varea, Rufino Varea, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Bronwyn M. Gillanders Rufino Varea, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Koster G. Sarakinis, Koster G. Sarakinis, Nina Wootton, Rufino Varea, Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Patrick Reis‐Santos, Nina Wootton, Rufino Varea, Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Patrick Reis‐Santos, Rufino Varea, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Patrick Reis‐Santos, Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Bronwyn M. Gillanders Patrick Reis‐Santos, Rufino Varea, Rufino Varea, Rufino Varea, Bronwyn M. Gillanders

Summary

Researchers reviewed global studies on microplastics in oysters and conducted their own sampling across eight sites in southern Australia. Globally, 94.4% of oysters contained microplastics, and the study found that wild-caught oysters contained more than double the microplastics of farmed specimens, likely because aquaculture operations tend to be located in cleaner waters.

Microplastics have been documented in a plethora of marine environments and organisms. These small plastics threaten ecosystem health, with implications for seafood species' health. Oysters are an important cultural and economic aquaculture species globally. Due to their filter feeding mechanisms, they can act as an indicator species and proxy for environmental contamination. This makes them an ideal organism for investigating microplastic pollution. Here, we first systematically reviewed the global literature investigating microplastic in oysters. Globally, 94.4% of all oysters had microplastics, with an average of 1.41 ± 0.33 per gram of soft tissue wet weight (gww). The review showed that wild-caught oysters contained more than double the amount of microplastic than aquaculture raised specimens, likely reflecting the clean and productive waters in which oyster aquaculture systems are commonly located. Second, we quantified microplastic presence and polymer type in commercially farmed oysters (Crassostrea gigas and Saccostrea glomerata) across a broad spatial scale, covering eight sites in southern Australia. Microplastics were present in 49.4% of all sampled oysters, with specimens from all locations containing microplastics. On average, whole oysters contained 0.83 ± 0.08 microplastics per individual or 0.09 ± 0.01 microplastics gww. Using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, we identified that 62% of the verified microplastics were vexar plastic netting, a low-density polyethylene commonly used in aquaculture production. Understanding the abundance and source of microplastic in these key seafood species is essential to determine if oysters are vulnerable to these contaminants and pose a risk to the oyster aquaculture industry as an important food resource.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper