0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Comparison of pre-treatment methods and heavy density liquids to optimize microplastic extraction from natural marine sediments

Scientific Reports 2022 39 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Granberg, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Granberg, Maria Granberg, Elisabet Ekstrand, Maria Granberg, Maria Granberg, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Maria Granberg, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Maria Granberg, Elisabet Ekstrand, Kerstin Magnusson Martin Hassellöv, Karin Mattsson, Maria Granberg, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Maria Granberg, Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Karin Mattsson, Martin Hassellöv, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Elisabet Ekstrand, Martin Hassellöv, Karin Mattsson, Karin Mattsson, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Maria Granberg, Maria Granberg, Elisabet Ekstrand, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Kerstin Magnusson Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Karin Mattsson, Maria Granberg, Kerstin Magnusson Karin Mattsson, Martin Hassellöv, Maria Granberg, Maria Granberg, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Maria Granberg, Martin Hassellöv, Martin Hassellöv, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Granberg, Kerstin Magnusson

Summary

Researchers compared multiple pre-treatment methods and density separation liquids for extracting microplastics from marine sediments, identifying optimised protocols that improved recovery rates and reduced contamination, supporting the development of more standardised monitoring approaches.

Study Type Environmental

The ubiquitous occurrence of anthropogenic particles, including microplastics in the marine environment, has, over the last years, gained worldwide attention. As a result, many methods have been developed to estimate the amount and type of microplastics in the marine environment. However, there are still no standardized protocols for how different marine matrices should be sampled or how to extract and identify these particles, making meaningful data comparison hard. Buoyant microplastics are influenced by winds and currents, and concentrations could hence be expected to be highly variable over time. However, since both high density and most of the initially buoyant microplastics are known to eventually sink and settle on the seafloor, marine sediments are proposed as a suitable matrix for microplastics monitoring. Several principles, apparatuses, and protocols for extracting microplastics from marine sediments have been presented, but extensive comparison of the different steps in the protocols using real environmental samples is lacking. Thus, in this study, different pre-treatment and subsequent density separation protocols for extraction of microplastics from replicate samples of marine sediment were compared. Two pre-treatment methods, one using inorganic chemicals (NaClO + KOH + NaPO) and one using porcine pancreatic enzymes, as well as one with no pre-treatment of the sediment, were compared in combination with two commonly used high-density saline solutions used for density separation, sodium chloride (NaCl) and zinc chloride (ZnCl). Both pre-treatment methods effectively removed organic matter, and both saline solutions extracted lighter plastic particles such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The most efficient combination, chemical pre-treatment and density separation with ZnCl, was found to extract > 15 times more particles (≥ 100 µm) from the sediment than other treatment combinations, which could largely be explained by the high presence and efficient extraction of PVC particles.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper