We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Application of electrostatic separation and differential scanning calorimetry for microplastic analysis in river sediments
Summary
Researchers developed a combined method integrating electrostatic separation, density separation, and differential scanning calorimetry for microplastic analysis in river sediments, demonstrating that the approach can process 100-1000 g sample masses and achieved 98% mass reduction in sand matrices and 70-78% in sediments before DSC polymer identification.
A method with the potential for comprehensive microplastic monitoring in river sediments is presented in this study. We introduce a novel combination of electrostatic separation, density separation, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Currently, microplastic analysis in sediments is limited in terms of sample masses, processing time, and analytical robustness. This work evaluated a method to process large sample masses efficiently and still obtain robust results. Four particulate matrices, including commercial sands and river sediments, were spiked with PCL, LD-PE, and PET microplastic particles (63–200 µm). Samples with a mass of 100 g and 1,000 g (sand only) contained 75 mg of each microplastic. After electrostatic separation, the mass of sand samples was reduced by 98%. Sediment samples showed a mass reduction of 70–78%. After density separation, the total mass reduction of sediment samples was above 99%. The increased concentration of total organic carbon seems to have the highest impact on mass reduction by electrostatic separation. Nevertheless, the recovery of microplastic was independent of the particulate matrix and was polymer-specific. In 100 g samples, the average recovery rates for PCL, LD-PE, and PET were 74 ± 9%, 93 ± 9%, and 120 ± 18%, respectively. The recoveries of microplastic from 1,000 g samples were 50 ± 8%, 114 ± 9%, and 82 ± 11%, respectively. In scale up experiments, high recoveries of all microplastics were observed with a decrease in standard deviation. Moreover, the biodegradable polymer PCL could be used as an internal standard to provide quality assurance of the process. This method can overcome the current limitations of routine microplastic analysis in particulate matrices. We conclude that this method can be applied for comprehensive microplastic monitoring in highly polluted sediments. More studies on electrostatic separation and polymer-specific recovery rates in complex matrices are proposed.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Regression analysis for the determination of microplastics in sediments using differential scanning calorimetry
Researchers developed a differential scanning calorimetry method for rapid identification and quantification of microplastics in sediment samples. The study demonstrated that this thermo-analytical approach could detect multiple polymer types including polyethylene, polypropylene, and PET in sand samples, offering a faster and more cost-efficient alternative to traditional microplastic analysis methods.
Microplastic analysis in sediments of the Elbe River by electrostatic separation and differential scanning calorimetry
Researchers surveyed 43 sediment samples from the Elbe River using electrostatic separation and differential scanning calorimetry, finding microplastics — predominantly polyethylene fibers — at concentrations up to 44.6 mg/kg in harbor basins, with the highest pollution in the middle Elbe between two major tributaries.
A facile approach to microplastic identification and quantification using differential scanning calorimetry
Researchers developed a simpler differential scanning calorimetry method to identify and quantify six types of semi-crystalline microplastic polymers in water samples, offering a lower-cost alternative to μFTIR that also provides mass concentration data.
Optimized microplastic analysis based on size fractionation, density separation and μ-FTIR
Researchers optimized a multi-step method for extracting and identifying microplastics from soil and sediment, combining grain size separation, density flotation, and infrared microscopy. The validated method achieved high recovery rates for eight common plastic polymers, contributing to more reliable monitoring of soil microplastic contamination.
Extraction of microplastics from sediment matrices: Experimental comparative analysis
Extraction efficiencies of four methods for separating microplastics from sediment matrices were experimentally compared using spiked samples, finding that density separation with saturated NaCl was adequate for most polymer types but underperformed for high-density polymers, and that no single method achieved complete recovery across all particle sizes and shapes.