We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic pollution in small rivers along rural–urban gradients: Variations across catchments and between water column and sediments
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared microplastic pollution in water column and sediments of two small Slovenian rivers with different levels of urbanization and wastewater treatment plant influence. Microplastic concentrations differed significantly between water samples from the two rivers but not in sediments, with fibers dominating in both matrices.
The aquatic ecosystems of the world are highly burdened with microplastics (MPs; particles <5 mm). There is a great need for better understanding of patterns of MP pollution across catchments and rivers of different sizes, anthropogenic pressures and hydrogeomorphological features. In this study, we investigated the MP concentrations including their characteristics (polymer type, shape, size and colour), and MP distribution in water and sediments of two hydrogeomorphologically different small-scale catchments (< 800 km2), namely Kamniška Bistrica (KB) and Ljubljanica (LJ), Slovenia. The main objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of how WWTP effluents and catchment urbanisation together with the diversity of natural hydrogeomorphology, affect the quantity and quality of MP pollutants in the rivers with smaller catchments. Significantly different mean MP concentrations were found in the water columns (KB: 59 ± 16 items m-3; LJ: 31 ± 14 items m-3), but not in the sediments (KB: 22 ± 20 items kg-1; LJ: 23 ± 25 items kg-1). A longitudinal gradient with increasing particle concentration was observed in both water and sediment samples and in both catchments. Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) particles dominated in all samples. Fibres were predominant in the water column samples, while fragments were more common in the sediment samples. MP particles were mostly coloured, and most of them were smaller than 2 mm in both water and sediment samples. The critical evaluation of the results and previous studies suggest that the characteristics of the catchment (anthropogenic pressures, size, climate, etc.), the hydrogeomorphology of the river (sediment type, discharge, flow velocity etc.), the sampling location along the river, the sampled compartment (water, sediment), the sampling method, and the hydrometeorological characteristics at the time of sampling, are important factors for observed MP concentrations and other characteristics.
More Papers Like This
Riverine microplastic contamination in southwest Germany: A large-scale survey
AI summary Read the abstract
A large-scale survey of microplastic contamination across multiple rivers in southwest Germany found that contamination increased from headwaters to lowland sections and was elevated downstream of urban areas and wastewater treatment plant discharges. Fibers dominated in all rivers, and the study highlighted rivers as both pathways and temporary sinks for microplastics.
Microplastic pollution differences in freshwater river according to stream order: Insights from spatial distribution, annual load, and ecological assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic pollution levels in a freshwater river across different land-use zones, finding higher concentrations near urban and agricultural areas than in forested regions. Fiber-type microplastics were predominant across all sampling locations.
Microplastic pollution in streams spanning an urbanisation gradient
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers sampled microplastics in small streams across an urbanization gradient and found contamination at all sites, with concentrations comparable to those in larger rivers and lakes. Fragments and small particles between 63 and 500 micrometers were the most common forms detected. Surprisingly, catchment-scale factors like population density and stormwater overflows did not predict microplastic levels well, suggesting that local-scale sources may be more important for pollution in small streams.
Microplastic Pollution in three Rivers in South Eastern Norway
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers sampled three rivers in southeastern Norway representing different land use types to measure microplastic pollution levels. Microplastics were found in all rivers, with concentrations varying by river and flow conditions, and fibers dominating the composition. The study also tested different sampling and analysis methods to identify the most practical approach for routine monitoring of freshwater microplastic pollution.
Microplastic distribution and their abundance along rivers are determined by land uses and sediment granulometry
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied two river watersheds and found that microplastics were widespread in both water and sediment, with concentrations in water rising alongside increased urban land use. Interestingly, microplastics trapped in sediment were more influenced by the grain size of the riverbed than by human activity. The findings suggest that both human factors and natural river characteristics work together to shape where microplastics end up in freshwater systems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.