0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Digestion of preserved and unpreserved fish intestines for microplastic analysis with emphasis on quality assurance

Journal of Cellular Biotechnology 2022 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Fabiola Lopez Avila, Sophie Stürmer, Adrian Monteleone, Dave Neely, Bernard R. Kuhajda, Anna George, Martin Knöll, Weronika Schary, Andreas Fath, Andreas Fath

Summary

Researchers tested different preservation methods for fish intestine samples and compared how well each allowed subsequent digestion and microplastic particle recovery. They found that certain preservation media degraded some microplastic types during processing, potentially leading to underestimates of contamination. The study provides a validated protocol for preserving fish gut tissue for microplastic analysis that minimizes particle loss.

Polymers

BACKGROUND, Different preservation media used on fish samples may influence the digestion of organic matter for microplastic (MP) particle detection. Comparison of fresh and conserved fish is thereby problematic. OBJECTIVE, For quality assurance purposes and comparability of MP research, a method for digestion of preserved tissue like intestine with little impact on most MP particles was implemented. METHODS, Conserved fish samples were digested using SDS, KOH and Fenton’s reagents. The effect of the different chemicals used on different MP particles was then analyzed using Raman hit quality. Therefore, different filter materials were investigated using PMMA particles. RESULTS, Moist grided nitrocellulose filter was found best suited for this study. The effects of this digestion protocol on different polymer particles differed among polymers. Two of the used polymer particles dissolved during SDS + KOH treatment. PVC hard showed the highest loss of Raman hit quality (29.5 %). Some fish showed residues of sand or chitin from insects depending on their feeding strategy which could not be digested using this protocol. CONCLUSION, Not every polymer could be detected reliably using this protocol. For residues like sand or chitin, a density separation and enzymatic chitin degradation using chitinase may be needed, which could be implemented into this protocol.

Share this paper