0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Experimental parameterization of microplastic fragmentation and degradation to develop a mechanistic model of micro- and nanoplastic fragmentation in the environment

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2022
Katherine Santizo, Katherine Santizo, Patrizia Pfohl, Wendel Wohlleben, S. Harrison, Richard Cross, Joana Sipe, Joana Sipe, Mark R. Wiesner, Antonia Praetorius, Gbotemi A. Adediran, Brandon Lopez, Charlotte Catrouillet, Claus Svendsen

Summary

Researchers subjected seven plastic types (LDPE, PP, HIPS, PU, PET, PLA, and PA) to controlled UV irradiation and hydrolysis under varying temperature, humidity, salinity, and pH conditions, using multiple analytical methods including the NanoRelease/ISO22293 protocol, ATR-FTIR, TOC, GPC, and particle counting to quantify fragmentation rates from micro- to nanoscale. Preliminary results showed HIPS and LDPE fragmented most under UV stress, generating the largest counts of particles in the 1-2 µm size class, providing parameterization data for mechanistic models of environmental microplastic fragmentation.

Microplastic abundance in the environment has been concerning thus there is a need to understand their pathways and rates for fragmentation and degradation in the environment. However, studies that provide data on rates in a systematic approach differentiating the rates related to specific degradation stressors is limited, and often confound multiple stressors. In this study we aim to address fragmentation and degradation of microplastics by stressing plastics with varying resiliency under different environmental conditions (LDPE, PP, HIPS, PU, PET, PLA, and PA). Using ISO4892, we subject microplastic powder at homogeneous UV intensity to varying exposure time, temperatures and relative humidity conditions. An adaptation of the OECD Hydrolysis Guideline (OECD Test No. 111) is also used to observe fragmentation and degradation of the microplastic powder over time under different pH, salinity, and temperature. To assess the pathways and quantify the rates, multiple analytics are utilized. The NanoRelease protocol, ISO22293:2020, was adapted to quantify the smallest fragments, 10nm to 1µm, thus allowing to show micro- to nano-plastic fragmentation. Chemical degradation is assessed via ATR-FTIR, TOC, and GPC analysis. In addition, microplastic fragments between 1-100 µm are analyzed with a particle counter. Preliminary results following two UV stresses show that HIPS and LDPE had the largest fragmentation with large particle counts in the size class of 1 and 2 µm while PP was most resilient with little to no fragmentation at these size classes. PP also had small changes in its Carbonyl Index whereas TPU and HIPS had the largest changes over UV exposure time. These information on fragmentation and chemical degradation per exposure allows rates to be developed for each polymer which can be implemented into models to understand and predict microplastic fragmentation in different environmental compartments. This is the ultimate goal of our collaborative project "cefic LRI ECO59, FRAGMENT-MNP". Also see: https://micro2022.sciencesconf.org/427037/document

Share this paper