0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Remediation Sign in to save

Occurrence and fate of microplastics from wastewater treatment plants assessed by a fluorescence-based protocol

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Jiajing Pan, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Jiajing Pan, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Hongtao Liu, Jiajing Pan, Jiajing Pan, Hongtao Liu, Hongtao Liu, Hongtao Liu, Feiyang Xia, Feiyang Xia, Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang, Jun Zhang, Dunqiu Wang, Jun Zhang, Jun Zhang, Dunqiu Wang Jun Zhang, Hongtao Liu, Hongtao Liu, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang, Jun Zhang, Jun Zhang, Jun Zhang, Jun Zhang, Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang Jun Zhang, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang, Dunqiu Wang Jun Zhang, Jun Zhang, Dunqiu Wang, Jun Zhang, Dunqiu Wang, Hongtao Liu, Dunqiu Wang Dunqiu Wang

Summary

A fluorescence-based protocol was developed to identify and quantify microplastics smaller than 500 micrometers in wastewater treatment plant effluent, improving on traditional methods that miss these smaller particles.

Study Type Environmental

Traditional stereomicroscopy (SM) is limited for the identification of microplastics of less than 500 µm in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Accordingly, novel methods for the accurate quantification of these microplastics are needed. In this study, we investigated the polymer type, morphology, size distribution, and abundance of microplastics in each unit of three selected WWTPs by SM and a fluorescence-based protocol (FR) combined with FTIR. Using the FR method, most microplastics detected in the three WWTPs were 50-200 µm in size. Polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyamide were the main polymer types, and the distributions of fibers, films, and debris were determined. Despite highly similar microplastic removal rates (78.6‒95.2% (SM) and 77.4‒94.2% (FR)) in the WWTPs by the two methods, the microplastic abundances obtained by FR (405‒6987 items/L) were approximately 2 orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding results by SM (1‒21 items/L). In addition, a considerable number of small-sized microplastics (< 500 µm) were detected in the effluents (405‒947 items/L) using FR. These results clearly reveal that microplastics in WWTPs have been seriously underestimated in most previous studies based on SM. Further research should focus on the environmental risks of small-sized microplastics from WWTPs.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper