0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Assessment and accumulation of microplastics in sewage sludge at wastewater treatment plants located in Cádiz, Spain

Environmental Pollution 2022 57 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Gemma Albendín, Gemma Albendín, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Amelia Franco, J.M. Arellano, J.M. Arellano, Gemma Albendín, María Dolores Coello Oviedo Gemma Albendín, María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ana Amelia Franco, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo Ana Pilar Martín-García, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, María Dolores Coello Oviedo Gemma Albendín, Gemma Albendín, J.M. Arellano, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Ana Amelia Franco, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo J.M. Arellano, Gemma Albendín, Gemma Albendín, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Gemma Albendín, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Gemma Albendín, José María Quiroga Alonso, Gemma Albendín, María Dolores Coello Oviedo José María Quiroga Alonso, Gemma Albendín, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, José María Quiroga Alonso, Ana Pilar Martín-García, Gemma Albendín, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, José María Quiroga Alonso, J.M. Arellano, José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Gemma Albendín, Ágata Egea-Corbacho, María Dolores Coello Oviedo Ágata Egea-Corbacho, Gemma Albendín, J.M. Arellano, J.M. Arellano, María Dolores Coello Oviedo J.M. Arellano, J.M. Arellano, María Dolores Coello Oviedo J.M. Arellano, María Dolores Coello Oviedo José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, J.M. Arellano, J.M. Arellano, María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo Ana Amelia Franco, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, Gemma Albendín, Gemma Albendín, José María Quiroga Alonso, Gemma Albendín, José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo José María Quiroga Alonso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo Ana Pilar Martín-García, María Dolores Coello Oviedo J.M. Arellano, María Dolores Coello Oviedo J.M. Arellano, José María Quiroga Alonso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, José María Quiroga Alonso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo María Dolores Coello Oviedo José María Quiroga Alonso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo José María Quiroga Alonso, José María Quiroga Alonso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo José María Quiroga Alonso, Rocío Rodríguez-Barroso, María Dolores Coello Oviedo

Summary

Researchers sampled microplastics from primary, secondary, and digested sludge at seven wastewater treatment plants in southern Spain, finding sludge acts as a significant sink for microplastics. Fragments and fibers under 2 mm were dominant, and concentrations varied significantly between urban and industrial plant types.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Sludge from Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been determined as a sink of microplastics (MP) removed from wastewater. The aim of this research work has been to evaluate the presence of these pollutants in the sludge of seven WWTPs (five urban and two industrial), located in southern Spain. Samples were collected in the primary, secondary and digested sludge matrixes, MPs were extracted following wet peroxide oxidation and the removal of cellulose, finally the samples were analyzed according to their abundance, size (from 100 μm to 5 mm), shape, colour, and polymer type. Subsequently, the data obtained on the WWTPs were compared, the main difference among the WWTPs and different sample points showed high heterogeneity in terms of abundance of microplastics, due to the differences in the sludge loaded, the processes and the type of sludge. The results from this study established that the most abundant shape was fibers; regarding the size, 100-355 μm fraction was the most abundant, showing that the amount of MPs increased when the size decreased. Regarding the type of polymers, 23 were identified by ATR-FTIR. Further, Acrylate, PE, EAA and PP were the most abundant found polymers. The presence of MPs in the digested sludge varied from 0.02 ± 0.006 MP g DW to 57.18 ± 20.69 MP g DW in the WWTP 6 (food industry) and WWTP 3 (urban city over 212,000 inhabitants), respectively; higher abundance of MPs found in the primary sludge in respect to secondary sludge; in concordance with the removal from wastewater line reported in other studies. The results obtained showed that MPs were widely present in sludge, becoming a sink of these pollutants, estimating that among 8.05 · 10 and 1.77 · 10 MPs · day were loaded to sludge; therefore, these facilities act as a significant source of MPs into agriculture when sludge is used as soil amendment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper