0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Assessment of Prevalence and Heterogeneity of Meso- and Microplastic Pollution in Icelandic Waters

Environments 2022 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Belén García Ovide, Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Belén García Ovide, Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Erica Cirino, Erica Cirino, Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Charla J. Basran, Kristian Syberg Torsten Geertz, Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Charla J. Basran, Torsten Geertz, Erica Cirino, Erica Cirino, Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Torsten Geertz, Kristian Syberg Torsten Geertz, Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg Kristian Syberg

Summary

Surface water sampling around Iceland found mesoplastics and microplastics at all six coastal sites, with nearshore locations near populated areas showing higher concentrations, suggesting local human activity contributes to plastic pollution even in remote subarctic waters.

Surface water samples were collected using a low-tech aquatic debris instrument (LADI) at six nearshore locations on the north and northwestern coasts of Iceland to investigate the prevalence of mesoplastic (5–10 mm) and microplastic (0.3–5 mm) in the region. This sampling strategy involved sampling each transect three times for a total of 18 samples collected in order to assess uncertainties related to heterogeneous distribution of plastic in surface waters. Samples in all six nearshore locations contained meso- and/or microplastic, though concentrations were highly variable. Visual, physical, and FTIR analyses were performed on 71 suspected plastic particles collected, confirming and identifying 40 of those particles as one of six types of plastic: polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyester, low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Lines originating from fishing gear were the most prevalent types of plastic detected across the samples. This study is among the first to quantify and identify microplastic particles collected in Icelandic nearshore surface waters.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper