0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Effect of polystyrene nanoplastics on the activated sludge process performance and biomass characteristics. A laboratory study with a sequencing batch reactor

Journal of Environmental Management 2022 17 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
C. Bretas Alvim, E. Ferrer-Polonio, A. Bes-Piá, J.A. Mendoza‐Roca, J. Fernández-Navarro, J.L. Alonso, Inmaculada Amorós

Summary

Researchers evaluated the effect of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics at 2 micrograms per liter on activated sludge performance and microbial community composition in a sequencing batch reactor over an extended laboratory experiment. No significant changes in nitrification or organic matter removal efficiency (96% for both reactors) were observed, but a notable increase in Patescibacteria abundance and stagnation of Nitrotoga growth in the nanoplastic-exposed reactor suggested subtle community-level sensitivity.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The fate and presence of nanoplastics in wastewater treatment systems is a topic of increasing interest. Furthermore, challenges related to their quantification and identification have made it difficult to set up experimental conditions and compare results between studies. In this study, the effect of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics on activated sludge was evaluated. A concentration of 2 μg/L was used to continuously feed a sequencing batch reactor (SBR-NPs). Under the experimental conditions used in this study, no changes were observed in the process performance of the SBR-NPs compared to the reactor used as a control. Neither nitrification nor organic matter removal efficiency, which was 96% for both SBRs, were affected by the presence of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics, which suggests that the tested nanoplastics were not sufficiently toxic to the biomass. Although no significant differences in the relative abundances of predominant phyla between SBR-Control and SBR-NPs were observed, a slight shift in the relative abundance of Patescibacteria (1.5 ± 0.6% and 3.7 ± 0.8% in SBR-Control and SBR-NPs, respectively, at the end of the test) occurred. The higher abundance of this phylum in SBR-NPs compared to SBR-Control may suggest that these bacteria have some sensitivity to the presence of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics. Furthermore, even with the absence of nitrification inhibition, it was observed stagnation of the growth of Nitrotoga bacteria in SBR-NPs, which also suggests that the polystyrene nanoplastics could have an inhibitory effect on these cells and an impact on nitrification in the long term.

Share this paper