0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Data for McAfee, Leung, Connell. Improving ecological function of polluted coasts under a tide of plastic pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (FEE21-0330.R1).

Figshare 2023 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jonathan Y.S. Leung Dominic McAfee, Jonathan Y.S. Leung Dominic McAfee, Jonathan Y.S. Leung Jonathan Y.S. Leung Jonathan Y.S. Leung Jonathan Y.S. Leung Sean D. Connell, Sean D. Connell, Sean D. Connell, Jonathan Y.S. Leung Jonathan Y.S. Leung

Summary

Researchers provided raw experimental data showing that Australian flat oysters can filter microplastics from polluted coastal water, supporting the case for using bivalves as a nature-based tool to improve ecological function on plastic-polluted coasts.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

This file contains the raw data for the oyster filtration experiments that are presented in the main manuscript (i.e., Figure 1) and the supplementary files (Panel Figure 1 and 2) of this paper (FEE21-0330.R1). No ethics approval was required for this work. <br> <em>Experiments for Figure 1 and Panel Figure 1 and 2</em>: Experiments were conducted using Australian Flat oysters (<em>Ostrea angasi</em>; ca. 2 years old) that were acclimated to controlled aquarium conditions (21.0 ± 0.5 °C; day/night cycle: 16/8 hr). Individual oysters were placed into experimental tanks (34 × 28 × 22 cm) filled with 17 L filtered seawater and cultivated microalgae (<em>Isochrysis </em>sp<em>.</em>) at an initial concentration of ~5 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells mL<sup>–1</sup>, and exposed to experimental treatments consisting of either 0, 10, or 100 µg L<sup>–1</sup> of polystyrene microspheres (diameter: 10 µm) crossed with either 0, 1, 2, 4 or 8 mg L<sup>–1</sup> of nitrigen fertiliser. Crossing all combinations of microplastic (three levels) and nitrogen (five levels) concentrations, 15 treatments were run both with and without oysters (<em>n</em> = 3 replicate tanks). Each of the 90 tanks were run in a temperature-controlled room (21.0 ± 0.5 °C) over four days under UV lights to stimulate continual growth of the microalgae. Changes in microalgae concentrations were measured per tank before and after the four-day exposure. From each tank, four aliquots (5 mL) were extracted, fixed with Lugol’s solution, and the microalgae concentration quantified using a haemocytometer under a light microscope. These four values were averaged to provide a single value per tank, with the process repeated for each replicate tank (<em>n</em> = 3 per treatment). <br> <em>Experiment for Panel Figure 2</em>: For the shock experiment, an individual oyster was placed in a tank (34 cm × 28 cm × 22 cm) filled with 7.5 L filtered seawater at one of four microplastic concentrations (0, 10, 100, or 1000 µg L–1; <em>n</em> = 5 replicate tanks per microplastic concentration). The oyster was allowed to rest for 2 hours, followed by adding algal suspension into the tank to obtain an initial microalgae concentration at ~5 × 105 cells mL–1. The oyster then fed for 9 hours. The final microalgae concentration was measured using a haemocytometer using the same method as described above. <br> Note<sup>1</sup>: the microplastic discharge data was extracted from Schmidt et al. 2017 (data accessible here: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.7b02368), wheras the river water discharge values were extracted from: Milliman and Farnsworth (2011) River Discharge to the Coastal Ocean: A Global Synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper