0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Influence of biochar and microplastics on microbial necromass accumulation and CO2 and N2O emission in a Calcaric Fluvisol

Figshare 2023 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yalan Chen

Summary

A 91-day soil experiment found that biochar reduced CO2 and N2O emissions, but the presence of microplastics partially counteracted these benefits, suggesting that plastic pollution can undermine soil carbon management strategies.

Polymers

Biochar application represents a promising soil management strategy for mitigating CO2 and N2O emissions, yet microplastics, as concurrent soil pollutants, may interact with biochar. In a 91-day microcosm experiment (25 ºC, 60 % of WHC), we investigated soil C and N dynamics following the addition of polyethylene microplastics (1 and 5% (w/w)) to a Calcaric Fluvisol already amended with biochar for one month. Biochar alone reduced CO2 and N2O emissions by 11% and 3%, while polyethylene reduced CO2 and N2O emission by 11‒26% and 4‒14%, respectively. The suppression of CO2 emissions by biochar and polyethylene was due to reduced soil aggregation and dissolved organic matter (DOM) content, as well as increased DOM aromaticity, all of which collectively led to diminished bacterial biomass and β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase activity. Biochar decreased N2O emissions by suppressing nirS and nirK genes while increasing nifH gene; polyethylene decreased N2O emission primarily by lowering nirK gene. Biochar alone resulted in a 34.6% decrease in microbial necromass carbon (MNC), primarily due to the suppression of bacterial abundance, thus leading to reduced efficiency in bacterial MNC production. On the other hand, polyethylene microplastics had a modest impact, slightly decreasing total MNC by 7.8‒11.0% in control soil, mainly due to dilution effects. However, in biochar-treated soil, polyethylene exerted a profound influence, markedly increasing MNC by 33.1‒60.8%. This enhancement can be attributed to the disruption of soil aggregation, which provided better protection for MNC, and a reduction in β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase activity, responsible for MNC decomposition. In summary, our findings reveal the interactive effects of biochar and polyethylene microplastics on MNC accumulation, as well as CO2 and N2O emissions. These insights shed light on the resilience and carbon sequestration potential of biochar-treated soil ecosystems in the face of environmental disturbances.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biochar and Microplastics Affect Microbial Necromass Accumulation and CO2 and N2O Emissions from Soil

Researchers investigated how biochar and polyethylene microplastics interact in soil and found that both reduced CO2 and N2O greenhouse gas emissions, though through different mechanisms. Microplastics decreased emissions primarily by reducing dissolved organic matter and bacterial biomass, while biochar suppressed nitrogen-cycling genes. When combined, microplastics in biochar-treated soil unexpectedly increased microbial necromass carbon by disrupting soil aggregates, revealing complex interactions between these two soil amendments.

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene microplastics hamper aged biochar’s potential in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions

Polyethylene microplastics (1–5% by weight) significantly reduced the greenhouse gas-mitigating benefits of aged biochar in agricultural soil, decreasing soil aggregation and altering dissolved organic matter dynamics—raising concerns about microplastic interference with biochar-based carbon sequestration strategies.

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene microplastic and biochar interactively affect the global warming potential of soil greenhouse gas emissions

A 45-day laboratory incubation experiment tested polyethylene microplastics and two types of biochar applied to agricultural soil alone and in combination, measuring effects on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial communities. Co-application of microplastic and biochar reduced the global warming potential of cumulative greenhouse gas emissions compared to microplastic alone, suggesting biochar partially mitigates microplastic effects on soil carbon cycling.

Article Tier 2

Biochar-microplastics interaction modulates soil nitrous oxide emissions and microbial communities

Researchers examined how biochar interacts with conventional and biodegradable microplastics in soil to affect coriander growth, nitrous oxide emissions, and microbial communities. They found that biochar generally reduced soil nitrous oxide emissions, but this benefit was diminished or even reversed when certain microplastics were present. The study suggests that the combined use of biochar and plastic mulch in agricultural fields can produce unexpected effects on greenhouse gas emissions and soil microbiology.

Article Tier 2

Effects of microplastics on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in the context of straw incorporation: A comparison with different types of soil

Researchers combined microplastic treatments with straw incorporation in different soil types and measured effects on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions, finding that microplastics altered carbon cycling and in some soils increased CO2 and N2O emissions.

Share this paper