0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

In search of an optimal moss transplant biomonitor for airborne microplastics: Moss cubes

Environmental Pollution 2025 2 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested different moss-based sampler designs for monitoring airborne microplastics and found that cube-shaped samplers captured the most particles with the least variation between samples. The study suggests that effective moss transplant monitors should use sufficient moss mass, larger mesh openings, and a three-dimensional shape to maximize exposure from all directions.

There is growing interest in the use of moss transplant samplers to assess atmospheric microplastics. Here we explored the influence of sampler design and exposure duration on the accumulation of microplastics. We evaluated three samplers, two bag samplers (5 cm × 8 cm) each containing 1 g of moss, but with different mesh sizes (1 mm versus 6 mm), and a 6 cm cube made from 6 mm mesh containing 3 g of moss. The cube samplers had the highest microplastic particle accumulation (2.92 mp/g), followed by 1 mm mesh bags (2.57 mp/g) and 6 mm mesh bags (1.97 mp/g). Further, cube samplers had the lowest variation between replicates, with all of them above the limit of detection. All sampler designs were dominated by fibres ranging from 80 % in cubes to 94 % in 6 mm mesh bags, suggesting that cubes captured a higher diversity of particle morphologies. The net loss in moss mass during sampler deployment was lowest for the cube samplers (3.9 %) and highest in 1 mm mesh bags (10.5 %). Transplant samplers exposed for six-weeks suggested higher particle accumulation than four-week exposures; however, mass concentration was lower in the six-week exposures, suggesting that heavier microplastics were lost. In general, the results suggest that effective moss transplant samplers should incorporate sufficient moss mass to ensure particle retention, larger mesh size (≥5 mm) to maximize exposure to atmospheric microplastics, and a three-dimensional shape to allow equal exposure from all sides. In this respect, we recommend the 'moss cube' sampler with a 6 mm mesh size containing at least 3 g of moss depending on cube dimensions.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Monitoring moss reveals widespread deposition of airborne microplastics across the UK – practical lessons and recommendations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the use of moss as a biomonitor for atmospheric microplastic deposition across the UK, drawing on established protocols for monitoring metals and nutrients in mosses. The study demonstrated that moss biomonitoring is practical for large-scale spatial surveys and provided recommendations for standardized collection, processing, and quantification methods.

Article Tier 2

Optimizing Moss and Lichen Transplants as Biomonitors of Airborne Anthropogenic Microfibers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested moss and lichen transplants as low-cost biomonitors for tracking airborne synthetic microfibers, including microplastics. Over a six-week experiment, both organisms effectively captured microfibers, with moss accumulating slightly more particles overall. The study found that the type of mesh bag used for transplanting affected results, providing practical guidance for standardizing this biomonitoring approach.

Article Tier 2

Potential Role of Mosses in Evaluating Airborne Microplastic Deposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the potential of mosses to serve as cost-effective biomonitors for tracking airborne microplastic deposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Preliminary studies indicate that mosses accumulate higher concentrations of microplastics than lichens, likely due to their physical structure. The study outlines steps needed to develop a standardized, reliable methodology for using mosses to monitor airborne microplastic pollution across both inhabited and remote regions.

Article Tier 2

Comparison of Lichens and Mosses as Biomonitors of Airborne Microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared lichens and mosses as biomonitors for airborne microplastics, finding that both organisms effectively capture and accumulate atmospheric microplastic particles, offering a simpler alternative to traditional labor-intensive sampling methods.

Article Tier 2

Moss as a biomonitor for the atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibres

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used moss (Bryophyta) as a passive biomonitor to track atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibres, finding that moss samples from various locations accumulated synthetic fibres reflecting local sources of airborne plastic contamination. The study establishes moss monitoring as a practical method for assessing microplastic atmospheric deposition without active collection equipment.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper