0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Optimizing Moss and Lichen Transplants as Biomonitors of Airborne Anthropogenic Microfibers

Biology 2023 25 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fiore Capozzi, Miriam Alberico, Alessandro Vergara, Fiore Capozzi, Fiore Capozzi, Manuela Rossi, Manuela Rossi, Fiore Capozzi, Fiore Capozzi, Manuela Rossi, Manuela Rossi, Maria Cristina Sorrentino, Simonetta Giordano Alessandro Vergara, Alessandro Vergara, Alessandro Vergara, Fiore Capozzi, Angelo Granata, Angelo Granata, Maria Cristina Sorrentino, Maria Cristina Sorrentino, Valeria Spagnuolo, Fiore Capozzi, Valeria Spagnuolo, Angelo Granata, Fiore Capozzi, Simonetta Giordano Miriam Alberico, Fiore Capozzi, Fiore Capozzi, Valeria Spagnuolo, Simonetta Giordano Miriam Alberico, Alessandro Vergara, Simonetta Giordano Miriam Alberico, Manuela Rossi, Angelo Granata, Simonetta Giordano Maria Cristina Sorrentino, Angelo Granata, Manuela Rossi, Simonetta Giordano Valeria Spagnuolo, Valeria Spagnuolo, Simonetta Giordano Manuela Rossi, Maria Cristina Sorrentino, Fiore Capozzi, Simonetta Giordano Simonetta Giordano Valeria Spagnuolo, Alessandro Vergara, Alessandro Vergara, Simonetta Giordano Valeria Spagnuolo, Simonetta Giordano

Summary

Researchers tested moss and lichen transplants as low-cost biomonitors for tracking airborne synthetic microfibers, including microplastics. Over a six-week experiment, both organisms effectively captured microfibers, with moss accumulating slightly more particles overall. The study found that the type of mesh bag used for transplanting affected results, providing practical guidance for standardizing this biomonitoring approach.

Anthropogenic microfibers (mfs) are synthetic particles composed of cellulose (cotton, rayon, acetate, etc.) or petrochemical-based polymers (i.e., microplastics-MPs) that are less than 5 mm in length. The accumulation of mfs, including MPs, in the moss <i>Hypnum cupressiforme</i> and the lichen <i>Pseudevernia furfuracea</i> was compared in a transplant experiment lasting 6 weeks. We also tested the effects of the bag used for transplants on the accumulation of mfs. Anthropogenic particles trapped by both biomonitors were mostly filamentous (99% mfs), and their number was overall higher in the moss (mean ± s.d. 102 ± 24) than in the lichen (mean ± s.d. 87 ± 17), at parity of sample weight. On average, mfs found in lichen were significantly longer than those found in moss bags, suggesting that lichens are less efficient at retaining smaller mfs. Exposure without the net yielded a higher mfs number accumulation in both species, indicating that "naked" transplants provide greater sensitivity. The calculation of daily fluxes evidenced a loss of mfs in the lichen, suggesting the presence of more stable bonds between moss and mfs. Raman microspectroscopy carried out on about 100 debris confirms the anthropogenic nature of mfs, of which 20% were MPs. Overall results indicate that moss is preferable to lichen in the biomonitoring of airborne mfs especially when exposed naked.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper