We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Optimizing Moss and Lichen Transplants as Biomonitors of Airborne Anthropogenic Microfibers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested moss and lichen transplants as low-cost biomonitors for tracking airborne synthetic microfibers, including microplastics. Over a six-week experiment, both organisms effectively captured microfibers, with moss accumulating slightly more particles overall. The study found that the type of mesh bag used for transplanting affected results, providing practical guidance for standardizing this biomonitoring approach.
Anthropogenic microfibers (mfs) are synthetic particles composed of cellulose (cotton, rayon, acetate, etc.) or petrochemical-based polymers (i.e., microplastics-MPs) that are less than 5 mm in length. The accumulation of mfs, including MPs, in the moss Hypnum cupressiforme and the lichen Pseudevernia furfuracea was compared in a transplant experiment lasting 6 weeks. We also tested the effects of the bag used for transplants on the accumulation of mfs. Anthropogenic particles trapped by both biomonitors were mostly filamentous (99% mfs), and their number was overall higher in the moss (mean ± s.d. 102 ± 24) than in the lichen (mean ± s.d. 87 ± 17), at parity of sample weight. On average, mfs found in lichen were significantly longer than those found in moss bags, suggesting that lichens are less efficient at retaining smaller mfs. Exposure without the net yielded a higher mfs number accumulation in both species, indicating that "naked" transplants provide greater sensitivity. The calculation of daily fluxes evidenced a loss of mfs in the lichen, suggesting the presence of more stable bonds between moss and mfs. Raman microspectroscopy carried out on about 100 debris confirms the anthropogenic nature of mfs, of which 20% were MPs. Overall results indicate that moss is preferable to lichen in the biomonitoring of airborne mfs especially when exposed naked.
More Papers Like This
Comparison of Lichen and Moss Transplants for Monitoring the Deposition of Airborne Microfibers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared lichen and moss transplants as tools for monitoring airborne microfiber pollution across urban sites in Italy. They found that lichens accumulated significantly more microfibers than mosses and were better at detecting differences between locations. The study suggests that lichen transplants offer a more effective and accessible biomonitoring approach for tracking airborne microplastic contamination in cities.
Comparison of Lichens and Mosses as Biomonitors of Airborne Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared lichens and mosses as biomonitors for airborne microplastics, finding that both organisms effectively capture and accumulate atmospheric microplastic particles, offering a simpler alternative to traditional labor-intensive sampling methods.
Moss as a biomonitor for the atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibres
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used moss (Bryophyta) as a passive biomonitor to track atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibres, finding that moss samples from various locations accumulated synthetic fibres reflecting local sources of airborne plastic contamination. The study establishes moss monitoring as a practical method for assessing microplastic atmospheric deposition without active collection equipment.
Potential Role of Mosses in Evaluating Airborne Microplastic Deposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the potential of mosses to serve as cost-effective biomonitors for tracking airborne microplastic deposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Preliminary studies indicate that mosses accumulate higher concentrations of microplastics than lichens, likely due to their physical structure. The study outlines steps needed to develop a standardized, reliable methodology for using mosses to monitor airborne microplastic pollution across both inhabited and remote regions.
Moss Bags as Biomonitors of Atmospheric Microplastic Deposition in Urban Environments
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested moss bags as a biomonitoring tool for measuring atmospheric microplastic deposition across an urban gradient in southern Ontario, Canada. They found that moss bags effectively captured microplastics, with higher deposition in more urbanized areas. The study demonstrates that moss-based monitoring is a practical, low-cost method for tracking airborne microplastic pollution in cities.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.