0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastics in the Baltic Sea region lakes—standardized insights reveal urban shoreline as key driver

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Ewa Babkiewicz, Elina Vecmane, Elina Vecmane, Magdalena Fuk, Magdalena Jurgielewicz, Agnieszka Koniuk, Eliza Kurek, Piotr Maszczyk, Magdalena Michalska‐Kacymirow, Daiva Jonuskiene, Jolanta Norvaišienė, Valentina Burdukovska, Inta Dimante‐Deimantovica, Juris Tunēns, Wojciech Pol, Ewa Bulska

Summary

Researchers implemented fully harmonized sampling and FTIR-verified analysis across ten lakes in Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland to assess microplastic contamination in the Baltic Sea region. By using a standardized methodology with the same team across all sites, they were able to identify urban shoreline proximity as the key driver of microplastic concentrations. The study demonstrates that methodological consistency is essential for meaningful comparisons of microplastic pollution levels across different locations.

Polymers

Microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous in aquatic environments and closely tied to human activities, yet linking measured concentrations to urban pressures remains challenging. Methodological inconsistencies inflate variance, obscure spatial patterns, and hinder comparability. We therefore implemented fully harmonized sampling and FTIR-verified analysis across ten lakes in Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, with all field and laboratory work performed by the same team. In parallel, we calculated an urbanization index to relate MP concentrations to shoreline development and urban influences. This design enabled comparisons of MPs in surface waters and sediments with ranges of 0.67-7.68 particles L⁻1 (water) and 0.09-3.90 particles g⁻1 dw (sediments). Polyethylene and polypropylene predominated, with fibres and fragments as the most common shapes; particles < 5 mm, and black, blue, or white, were most frequent. Shoreline urbanization, quantified by the shoreline urbanization index, was the only significant predictor of MPs in surface waters, explaining ~ 74% of variance, while nutrient concentrations, lake type, proximity to point sources, and season showed no consistent effect. Seasonal shifts in particle shape and type were observed but not in total abundance. MP concentrations were broadly similar among countries, with modest, statistically inconclusive differences in particle size and colour, indicating limited regional variation once methodological noise is removed. Our findings highlight that harmonized protocols sharpen the detection of environmental drivers and may overturn previously reported geographic differences driven by inconsistent methods. This first fully standardized, multi-lake, cross-country MP survey provides a robust framework for future monitoring and mitigation in inland waters.

Share this paper