We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Implicit association test (IAT) toward climate change: A PRISMA systematic review
Summary
This systematic review of Implicit Association Test studies found that people generally hold more positive unconscious attitudes toward nature and sustainability than they explicitly express. The disconnect between implicit and explicit attitudes suggests that pro-environmental behavior interventions should target unconscious biases alongside conscious decision-making.
Global environmental concerns affecting our planet require immediate action. To better understand the psychological dynamics underlying the adoption of pro-environmental behaviors, research increasingly directed its attention to the implicit (unconscious) psychological antecedents (attitudes) of the adoption of sustainable behaviors against climate change. The objective of this systematic review was to examine and summarize the current evidence for the association between the implicit attitudes related to climate change measured through the Implicit Association Test (IAT), and the explicit attitudes, beliefs, and identity toward climate change. Based on PRISMA guidelines, a structured electronic literature search of Google Scholar, PsycInfo, PubMed, Science Direct, PsycArticles, Sociological Abstracts, and Academic Search Complete was conducted. Of the 943 abstracts screened, only 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies testified independence between implicit and explicit attitudes towards climate change (absence of correlation). Despite this, implicit attitudes still predicted pro-environmental identity, while contradictory results appeared with beliefs. This highlights the urgency of promoting new research to understand on a deeper level dynamics involving implicit attitudes.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Trait emotional intelligence and ecological outcomes: the role of connectedness to nature
Researchers found that people with higher emotional intelligence show stronger connections to nature, which in turn promotes more environmentally responsible behaviors. The study suggests that environmental education programs targeting emotional intelligence could be effective at encouraging ecological action.
Consistent or inconsistent? The effects of inducing cognitive dissonance vs. cognitive consonance on the intention to engage in pro-environmental behaviors
Researchers investigated how cognitive dissonance between environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavior influences individuals' rationalization strategies, finding that attempts to induce cognitive consonance could shift behavioral intentions, with implications for designing more effective pro-environmental communications.
Explicitly and Implicitly Measured Valence and Risk Attitudes Towards Plastic Packaging, Plastic Waste, and Microplastic in a German Sample
This psychology study measured both explicit and implicit attitudes toward plastic packaging and microplastics in German consumers, finding that people simultaneously appreciate the convenience of plastic while expressing concern about pollution. The gap between attitudes and behavior helps explain why plastic consumption continues despite public concern about microplastics.
Social Preferences and Environmental Behavior: A Comparison of Self-Reported and Observed Behaviors
A study comparing self-reported and observed environmental behaviors found people often overstate how pro-environmentally they act. Social preferences and peer influence shape both stated and actual behaviors, with implications for designing more effective environmental campaigns.
Influencing factors and mechanism of tourists’ pro-environmental behavior – Empirical analysis of the CAC-MOA integration model
Using a stimulus-organism-response framework, this study modeled the factors and mechanisms driving tourists' pro-environmental behaviors at destinations, integrating cognitive-affective-conative theory and motivation theory to identify key psychological and contextual predictors. The findings inform destination management strategies aimed at encouraging environmentally responsible tourism behavior.