0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

First approach to assess the effects of nanoplastics on the soil species Folsomia candida: A mixture design with bisphenol A and diphenhydramine

NanoImpact 2023 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ângela Barreto, Joana Santos, Lara Almeida, Vítor Grade Tavares, Edgar Pinto, María Celeiro, Carmen Garcı́a-Jares, Vera L. Maria

Summary

Researchers examined how nanoplastics interact with bisphenol A and diphenhydramine in soil, finding that nanoplastics can modulate the toxicity of co-contaminants to the springtail Folsomia candida, acting as carriers that alter chemical bioavailability.

Polymers
Body Systems

The terrestrial environment is one of the main recipients of plastic waste. However, limited research has been performed on soil contamination by plastics and even less assessing the effects of nanoplastics (NPls). Behind the potential toxicity caused per se, NPls are recognized vectors of other environmental harmful contaminants. Therefore, the main aim of the present study is to understand whether the toxicity of an industrial chemical (bisphenol A - BPA) and a pharmaceutical (diphenhydramine - DPH) changes in the presence of polystyrene NPls to the terrestrial invertebrate Folsomia candida. Assessed endpoints encompassed organismal (reproduction, survival and behavior) and biochemical (neurotransmission and oxidative stress) levels. BPA or DPH, 28 d single exposures (1 to 2000 mg/kg), induce no effect on organisms' survival. In terms of reproduction, the calculated EC50 (concentration that causes 50% of the effect) and determined LOEC (lowest observed effect concentration) were higher than the environmental concentrations, showing that BPA or DPH single exposure may pose no threat to the terrestrial invertebrates. Survival and reproduction effects of BPA or DPH were independent on the presence of NPls. However, for avoidance behavior (48 h exposure), the effects of the tested mixtures (BPA + NPls and DPH + NPls) were dependent on the NPls concentration (at 0.015 mg/kg - interaction: no avoidance; at 600 mg/kg - no interaction: avoidance). Glutathione S-transferase activity increased after 28 d exposure to 100 mg/kg DPH + 0.015 mg/kg NPls (synergism). The increase of lipid peroxidation levels found after the exposure to 0.015 mg/kg NPls (a predicted environmental concentration) was not detected in the mixtures (antagonism). The results showed that the effects of the binary mixtures were dependent on the assessed endpoint and the tested concentrations. The findings of the present study show the ability of NPls to alter the effects of compounds with different natures and mechanisms of toxicity towards soil organisms, showing the importance of environmental risk assessment considering mixtures of contaminants.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effects of environmentally relevant mixtures of microplastics on terrestrial organisms

This study evaluated the effects of environmentally relevant microplastic mixtures on two soil model organisms, the earthworm Eisenia andrei and the springtail Folsomia candida, addressing the gap in knowledge about mixture effects at realistic environmental concentrations. Microplastic mixtures caused measurable effects on both soil organisms, with combined exposures producing different outcomes than single-polymer studies suggest.

Article Tier 2

Role of Biodegradable and Non-Biodegradable Microplastic in Modulating the toxicological Effects of Organic Pollutants in the Soil Organism Folsomia candida

Researchers exposed soil-dwelling springtail insects to combinations of microplastics and agricultural chemicals and found that biodegradable plastics (PBAT- and starch-based) made the toxicity of pesticides and veterinary drugs significantly worse, while conventional polyethylene plastic did not — raising concerns that "eco-friendly" biodegradable plastics may actually increase chemical risks in farming soils.

Article Tier 2

Effects of environmentally relevant mixtures of microplastics on terrestrial organisms

Researchers tested the effects of environmentally realistic microplastic mixtures on the earthworm Eisenia andrei and the springtail Folsomia candida as soil model organisms. Even at environmentally relevant concentrations, the microplastic mixture caused measurable negative effects on soil organism health and reproduction.

Article Tier 2

Interactions of Microplastics with Pesticides in Soils and Their Ecotoxicological Implications

This review examines how microplastics interact with pesticides in soil environments, finding that microplastics can sorb and transport pesticides, potentially altering their bioavailability and toxicity to soil organisms and ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Combined toxicity of organophosphate flame retardants and polyethylene microplastics on Eisenia fetida: Biochemical and molecular insights

Researchers exposed earthworms to polyethylene microplastics, chlorinated flame retardants, and their combinations to assess combined toxicity effects. They found that the most toxic flame retardant (TDCPP) had its effects reduced when combined with microplastics, likely because the plastics absorbed the chemical and lowered its bioavailability. In contrast, microplastics enhanced the toxicity of another flame retardant (TCPP), demonstrating that microplastics can act as both carriers and modulators of co-contaminant toxicity in soil ecosystems.

Share this paper