0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastic distribution among estuarine sedimentary habitats utilized by intertidal crabs

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 27 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Peter Vermeiren, Peter Vermeiren, Peter Vermeiren, Peter Vermeiren, Peter Vermeiren, Peter Vermeiren, Kou Ikejima Kou Ikejima Kou Ikejima Kou Ikejima Kou Ikejima Kou Ikejima Cynthia C. Muñoz, Cynthia C. Muñoz, Yurina Uchida, Kou Ikejima Cynthia C. Muñoz, Cynthia C. Muñoz, Yurina Uchida, Yurina Uchida, Peter Vermeiren, Kou Ikejima Yurina Uchida, Cynthia C. Muñoz, Kou Ikejima Yurina Uchida, Yurina Uchida, Kou Ikejima Cynthia C. Muñoz, Kou Ikejima

Summary

This study mapped microplastic distribution across multiple sedimentary habitat types in an estuary to support spatially refined risk assessments for intertidal fauna. Results showed microplastic abundance varied significantly by habitat, with implications for species that rely on specific substrates.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

The high accumulation potential of estuaries for plastics, particularly microplastics, poses a threat to the high societal value and biodiversity they provide. To support a spatially refined evaluation of the risk that microplastic pollution poses to fauna utilizing estuarine sedimentary habitats, we investigated the distribution of microplastics (lower limit of quantification, LOQ = 62 μm) at the sediment surface of two dominant habitats, and subsequently compared microplastic burdens between two crabs species utilizing these habitats. Microplastics were dominated by low density polyolefins (45-50 %), comparable to the polymer composition of macroplastics. The vast majority (99 %) of microplastics were ≤1 mm, and increased exponentially (with an exponent of 2.7) in abundance at smaller sizes, hinting at three-dimensional fragmentation. Our results suggest that the presence of vegetation needs to be accounted for in risk assessments with small microplastics (≥62 μm and ≤1 mm) on average 2.6 times more prevalent within reed beds compared to mudflats. Additionally, sediment properties also play a role with an exponential decrease in small microplastic abundance at coarser sediments, increased organic matter content, and decreased water content. These results suggest that at specific locations, such as the study area, local sources can provide a substantial contribution to microplastic contamination. To translate these habitat- and site-specific differences into a risk assessment relevant for macroinvertebrates, ecological traits such as differences in feeding modes should be accounted for, as we found substantial differences in both size and abundance of microplastics in gastrointestinal tracts of two crab species, Chiromantes dehaani and Chasmagnathus convexus, with different feeding modes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper