0
Article Tier 2 Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Natural and synthetic microfibers alter growth and behavior in early life stages of estuarine organisms

Frontiers in Marine Science 2023 56 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed early life stages of estuarine fish and invertebrates to natural cotton and synthetic polyester and polypropylene microfibers commonly found in coastal waters. Both natural and synthetic fibers affected growth and behavior, though synthetic fibers tended to cause more pronounced effects. The study suggests that microfiber pollution in coastal environments poses risks to young marine organisms during their most vulnerable developmental stages.

Polymers
Body Systems

Increasing shares of microfibers are being detected in environmental samples and a closer look to identify the risk associated with them using ecologically relevant endpoints, especially at sensitive early life stages, is needed. To assess exposure hazards, we used rope samples representative of fiber types ubiquitous in coastal systems, where microfibers are often the most common debris type found in the water column. To compare responses to natural vs. synthetic microfibers, we used rinsed “natural” cotton, polyester, and polypropylene microfibers (80-150 µm length, 8-20 µm width) created from the rope. Larval and juvenile estuarine indicator species Inland Silverside (Menidia beryllina) and mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) , respectively, were exposed to these three microfiber types at three concentrations (3, 10, 30 particles/ml) along a 5-25 PSU salinity gradient to mimic estuarine conditions. Behavioral responses, growth, and ingestion were measured. The cotton microfibers were not detected in the digestive tracts of Silversides, however, both the polyester and polypropylene microfibers were detected in the Silversides’ stomach and gut lining. None of the fiber types were detected in mysid shrimps. Mysids exposed to cotton microfibers had fewer behavioral effects compared to Silversides, who responded more to cotton. Cotton exerted no effect on growth in Silversides but did cause reduced growth in the mysids at the two lower salinities. In contrast, polyester and polypropylene were identified to have a significant dose dependent effect on mysid and Silverside behavior as well as growth was affected in at least one of the three salinities at concentrations as low as 3 particles/ml. Cotton impacted both the organism’s behavior more at higher salinities, whereas polyester and polypropylene had more impacts at lower salinities. This raises concerns for microfiber impacts on estuarine ecosystems and the need for policies to limit microfiber production and outfall into the aquatic environment.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Impact of polyester and cotton microfibers on growth and sublethal biomarkers in juvenile mussels

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed juvenile mussels to polyester and cotton microfibers at realistic ocean concentrations for 94 days and found that polyester microfibers reduced mussel growth rates by up to 36%, suggesting that microplastic fiber pollution could harm marine ecosystems and threaten shellfish aquaculture.

Article Tier 2

Influence of synthetic and natural microfibers on the growth, substance exchange, energy accumulation, and oxidative stress of field-collected microalgae compared with microplastic fragment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested how synthetic microfibers from plastics like PET and polypropylene affect freshwater algae compared to natural fibers like cotton and wool. The synthetic fibers inhibited algae growth more than natural fibers and caused oxidative damage to the cells, with fiber-shaped particles being more harmful than fragments of the same material. Since algae form the base of aquatic food chains, damage to them from microplastic fibers could ripple through ecosystems and affect the fish and water that humans depend on.

Article Tier 2

Synthetic and natural microfibers induce gut damage in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed brine shrimp to polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and natural lyocell microfibers and assessed mortality and gut damage. The study found that all three fiber types caused gut damage regardless of polymer origin, with polyethylene terephthalate fibers inducing the highest mortality, suggesting that the physical shape of microfibers may be as important as their chemical composition in causing harm to aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

Are Microfibers a Threat to Marine Invertebrates? A Sea Urchin Toxicity Assessment.

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested the ecotoxicological effects of cotton, polyester, and mixed-fiber microfibers on sea urchin embryos, finding that synthetic polyester fibers caused the most significant developmental impairment. The results suggest that the rapid expansion of fast fashion and its associated synthetic textile waste is creating a meaningful ecotoxicological hazard for marine invertebrates.

Article Tier 2

Multi-level approach to investigate sublethal effects caused by synthetic and natural microfibers on Daphnia magna

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed freshwater organisms including amphipods and oligochaetes to synthetic and natural microfibers at multiple levels of biological organization, finding that both fiber types caused sublethal physiological and behavioral effects, with synthetic fibers generally producing greater harm.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper