0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Natural and synthetic microfibers alter growth and behavior in early life stages of estuarine organisms

Frontiers in Marine Science 2023 56 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Samreen Siddiqui Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Samreen Siddiqui Sara J. Hutton, Samreen Siddiqui Samreen Siddiqui Samreen Siddiqui Sara J. Hutton, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, John Dickens, John Dickens, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Emily I. Pedersen, John Dickens, Emily I. Pedersen, Samreen Siddiqui John Dickens, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Sara J. Hutton, Sara J. Hutton, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Samreen Siddiqui Stacey L. Harper, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Susanne M. Brander, Sara J. Hutton, Samreen Siddiqui Samreen Siddiqui Samreen Siddiqui

Summary

Researchers exposed early life stages of estuarine fish and invertebrates to natural cotton and synthetic polyester and polypropylene microfibers commonly found in coastal waters. Both natural and synthetic fibers affected growth and behavior, though synthetic fibers tended to cause more pronounced effects. The study suggests that microfiber pollution in coastal environments poses risks to young marine organisms during their most vulnerable developmental stages.

Polymers
Body Systems

Increasing shares of microfibers are being detected in environmental samples and a closer look to identify the risk associated with them using ecologically relevant endpoints, especially at sensitive early life stages, is needed. To assess exposure hazards, we used rope samples representative of fiber types ubiquitous in coastal systems, where microfibers are often the most common debris type found in the water column. To compare responses to natural vs. synthetic microfibers, we used rinsed “natural” cotton, polyester, and polypropylene microfibers (80-150 µm length, 8-20 µm width) created from the rope. Larval and juvenile estuarine indicator species Inland Silverside (Menidia beryllina) and mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) , respectively, were exposed to these three microfiber types at three concentrations (3, 10, 30 particles/ml) along a 5-25 PSU salinity gradient to mimic estuarine conditions. Behavioral responses, growth, and ingestion were measured. The cotton microfibers were not detected in the digestive tracts of Silversides, however, both the polyester and polypropylene microfibers were detected in the Silversides’ stomach and gut lining. None of the fiber types were detected in mysid shrimps. Mysids exposed to cotton microfibers had fewer behavioral effects compared to Silversides, who responded more to cotton. Cotton exerted no effect on growth in Silversides but did cause reduced growth in the mysids at the two lower salinities. In contrast, polyester and polypropylene were identified to have a significant dose dependent effect on mysid and Silverside behavior as well as growth was affected in at least one of the three salinities at concentrations as low as 3 particles/ml. Cotton impacted both the organism’s behavior more at higher salinities, whereas polyester and polypropylene had more impacts at lower salinities. This raises concerns for microfiber impacts on estuarine ecosystems and the need for policies to limit microfiber production and outfall into the aquatic environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper