0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

First Evidence of Microplastic Occurrence in the Marine and Freshwater Environments in a Remote Polar Region of the Kola Peninsula and a Correlation with Human Presence

Biology 2023 32 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Anita Kaliszewicz, Ninel Panteleeva, Kamil Karaban, Tomasz Runka, Michał Winczek, Ewa Beck, Agnieszka Poniatowska, Izabella Olejniczak, Paweł Boniecki, Е. В. Голованова, Jerzy Romanowski

Summary

Researchers documented the first evidence of microplastic contamination in both marine and freshwater environments in a remote tundra region of the Kola Peninsula near the Arctic. Microplastics were found in all water samples from the Barents Sea and nearby lakes, with concentrations correlating to the proximity of a human research station. The findings indicate that even minimal human presence in remote polar regions can contribute to local microplastic pollution.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MPs) have even been detected in remote environments, including high-latitude regions, where human activities are restricted or strongly limited. We investigated the surface water of the bays of the Barents Sea and the freshwater lakes that are located close to and several kilometers from a year-round resident field station in the remote tundra region of the Kola Peninsula. The microplastics' presence in aquatic environments in this region has not been indicated yet. Microplastics were detected in all samples collected from the Barents Sea (<4800 items·m-3) and the lakes (<3900 items·m-3). Fibers made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-the most common thermoplastic polymer of the polyester family-and semi-synthetic cellulosic rayon were the most dominant. This indicated that the source of fiber contamination may come from protective clothes, ropes, ship equipment, and fishing nets. Small microplastics can spread through current and atmospheric transport. The Norwegian Current is likely responsible for the lack of correlations found between MP contamination and the distance from the field station between the studied bays of the Barents Sea. On the contrary, a significant correlation with human presence was observed in the concentration of microfibers in the water of the tundra lakes. The number of MP fibers decreased with an increase in the distance from the field station. This is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, that reports such a correlation in a remote region. We also discuss implications for animals. Our results show that even the most isolated ecosystems are not free from microplastic pollution.

Share this paper