We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparison of Physical Properties and Degradation of Polylactic Acid and Polypropylene Facemask Layer
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) face mask layers to standard polypropylene ones, finding PLA degraded significantly faster in seawater, river water, and soil — suggesting biodegradable alternatives could reduce the microplastic pollution that conventional mask fibers generate as they break down.
The current 3-ply facemasks are produced mostly using polypropylene (PP) as the main plastic layer that is a non-biodegradable polymer. The objective of this study was to fabricate a polylactic acid (PLA) layer, a biodegradable polymer, using the electrospinning process. Comparison on the degradation trend of PLA layer and PP layer obtained from commercial 3-ply face mask (CFM) layer in seawater, river water, soil, and compost environment for a total of 60 days was observed. Results showed that the electrospinning method can produce PLA layers with similar thickness with current CFM layer, narrow distribution of fiber diameter, and slightly dense surface morphology comparable to the CFM. Synthesized PLA fiber layer shows 68.6%, 39.8%, and 415.7% improvement in tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break, respectively, compared to CFM samples. Meanwhile, for the degradation study, PLA samples show more significant changes on its morphology corresponding to the degradation process that occurred on its fibers in the seawater, river water, and soil environment, whereas for the weight change study, only the soil environment shows significant changes after 45 days. In contrast, CFM samples did not show any significant changes corresponding to degradation activity.
More Papers Like This
Microbial Degradation of Synthetic Plastics Released from COVID-19 Generated Single Use Disposable Face Masks
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated microbial degradation of synthetic plastics from COVID-19 single-use face masks, finding that pandemic-driven surges in disposable mask use added significant plastic burdens to agricultural soils, with implications for soil microbiota and ecosystem health.
Characterization, toxicity evaluation, and mitigation strategy of micro/nanoplastics released from face masks
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers characterized microplastic and nanoplastic particles released from face mask fabrics under mechanical stress, demonstrated developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos, and developed an iron chloride coagulation method to remove these particles from water. The study reveals that disposable face masks — widely used during COVID-19 — are an underrecognized source of micro- and nanoplastics that enter aquatic environments and pose early-life developmental risks.
Facemask and PPE (COVID-19)-Associated Micro- and Nanoplastic Wastes—Study of Cause and Effect
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigate how the surge in single-use face masks and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic became a significant new source of micro- and nanoplastic pollution, tracing the environmental pathways from widespread PPE disposal to contamination of ecosystems.
Face Masks: New Source of Microplastic Release in the Environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that the massive global surge in disposable face mask use during COVID-19 introduced a significant new source of microplastic pollution, as masks made from polypropylene and polyurethane degrade and shed tiny plastic particles into the environment.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.