We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Is plastic dust different from mineral dust? Results from idealized wind tunnel experiments.
Summary
Researchers conducted wind tunnel experiments to compare how plastic particles of different sizes detach from flat surfaces in wind compared to mineral dust particles. Plastic particles required higher wind speeds to become airborne than mineral dust of similar size, likely due to shape differences. These findings inform atmospheric transport models for predicting how far and how much microplastic can be carried by wind across the landscape.
Atmospheric transport has been shown to effectively disperse microplasticparticulate matter to virtually every environment on the planet. Despite thisefficient long-range transport, only few studies have examined the fundamentalmechanisms of the atmospheric transport of microplastics. Here, we present theresults of wind tunnel experiments, examining the detachment behavior of plasticparticles ranging from 38 to 125 µm in diameter from flat substrates.Detachment was achieved solely by aerodynamic forces of the turbulent airflow.The detachment behavior of spheric microplastic particles (Polyethylene) andspheric glass microparticles (Borosilicate) of nominally the same diameter(63-75 µm) are contrasted across substrates with hydrophilic to hydrophobicsurface coatings. We further examine the effect of particle-particle collisions onthe detachment behavior of both Polyethylene and glass spheres. The criticalfriction velocity (u*,th), which is defined as the value at which 50% of allmicroparticles detach, ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 ms −1. Particle-particle collisionsreduced the u*,th of glass, but not that for PE. Results were compared withpredictions of a Jonhson-Kendall-Roberts model. The relation of diameter tou*,th compared well between results and prediction for Polyethylene spheres.Glass spheres were predicted to detach at smaller u*,th than polyethylenespheres, but detached at higher u*,th. Here, we argue that capillary forcesincreased the adhesion, which is not covered by the model. The combination ofparticle and substrate hydrophobicity influenced the relative humidity, at whichcapillary forces increased u*,th.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Is transport of microplastics different from that of mineral dust? Results from idealized wind tunnel studies
Researchers conducted wind tunnel experiments to examine the detachment and transport behavior of microplastics ranging from 38 to 125 um in diameter from idealized substrates, comparing their aerodynamic behavior to the well-established literature on mineral dust transport. The study identified key differences in microplastic detachment mechanisms relevant to understanding long-range atmospheric dispersal of plastic particles.
Is transport of microplastics different from mineral particles? Idealized wind tunnel studies on polyethylene microspheres
Wind tunnel experiments revealed that plastic (polyethylene) microspheres behave differently from mineral dust particles when transported by wind, particularly on hydrophobic surfaces, where plastic particles detach and become airborne more readily. Particle-to-particle collisions were found to both assist and impede detachment. These findings help explain why microplastics are found in remote atmospheric environments and improve models for predicting how far plastic particles can travel through the air from pollution sources.
Effects of Shape and Size on Microplastic Atmospheric Settling Velocity
Researchers measured atmospheric settling and horizontal drift velocities of various microplastic shapes and sizes in controlled settling chambers, providing empirical data needed to improve atmospheric transport models that explain how microplastics reach remote environments.
Tracing the horizontal transport of microplastics on rough surfaces
Wind tunnel experiments showed that microplastics of different shapes are transported horizontally across rough surfaces at wind speeds above threshold values, with flatter and lighter particles moving farther per wind impulse, providing empirical data for modeling atmospheric microplastic dispersal across terrestrial landscapes.
Macroplastic surface characteristics change during wind abrasion
Laboratory wind tunnel experiments showed that wind-driven abrasion of macroplastics on sandy surfaces produces distinct surface features and generates secondary microplastic particles, demonstrating that wind erosion is a meaningful pathway for plastic fragmentation in arid and coastal environments.