0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Distinct influence of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on microbe-driving nitrogen cycling processes in soils and plastispheres as evaluated by metagenomic analysis

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023 156 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiaojing Hu, Xiaojing Hu, Guanghua Wang Xiaojing Hu, Xiaojing Hu, Haidong Gu, Haidong Gu, Haidong Gu, Yongbin Wang, Haidong Gu, Yongbin Wang, Yongbin Wang, Xiangxin Sun, Xiaojing Hu, Xiangxin Sun, Junjie Liu, Yongbin Wang, Yongbin Wang, Junjie Liu, Yansheng Li, Zhenhua Yu, Junjie Liu, Zhenhua Yu, Yansheng Li, Yansheng Li, Xiaojing Hu, Jian Jin, Jian Jin, Junjie Liu, Yansheng Li, Yansheng Li, Yansheng Li, Guanghua Wang Jian Jin, Jian Jin, Jian Jin, Guanghua Wang Guanghua Wang Guanghua Wang

Summary

Researchers compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics affect nitrogen cycling by soil microbes. They found that biodegradable microplastics caused stronger changes to microbial communities and nitrogen processing pathways than conventional plastics, particularly by enriching certain bacteria on their surfaces. The study suggests that even biodegradable plastic mulch alternatives may significantly alter soil nutrient cycling in agricultural settings.

Polymers

Plastic mulching is one of the large contributors to microplastic (MP) accumulation in agricultural landscapes. However, the effects of conventional (PE-MPs) and biodegradable MPs (BMPs) on microbial functional and genomic information encoding nitrogen (N) cycling have yet to be addressed. Here, a soil microcosmic experiment was conducted by adding PE-MPs and BMPs to a Mollisol at dosage of 5% (w/w) followed by incubation for 90 days. The soils and MPs were examined by metagenomics and genome binning methods. The results revealed that BMPs harbored rougher surfaces and induced stronger alterations in microbial functional and taxonomic profiles in the soil and plastisphere than PE-MPs. In comparison to their respective soils, the plastispheres of PE-MPs and BMPs stimulated the processes of N fixation, N degradation and assimilatory nitrate reduction (ANRA) and reduced the gene abundances encoding nitrification and denitrification, in which BMPs induced stronger influences than PE-MPs. Ramlibacter mainly drove the differences in N cycling processes between the soils containing two types of MPs and was further enriched in the BMP plastisphere. Three high-quality genomes were identified as Ramlibacter stains with higher abundances in the plastisphere of BMP than that of PE-MP. These Ramlibacter strains had the metabolic capacities of N fixation, N degradation, ANRA and ammonium transport, which were potentially attributed to their biosynthesis and the accumulation of soil NH-N. Taken together, our results highlight the genetic mechanisms of soil N bioavailability in the presence of biodegradable MPs, which have important implications for maintaining sustainable agriculture and controlling microplastic risk.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper