0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Occurrence and Removal of Microplastic in Sewage Treatment Facilities in Chungcheongbuk-do

Journal of Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology 2023
Hye‐Sung Kim, Joon-Sik Moon, Jun-Young Jo, Chan-Geun Lee, Young-Cheol Cho, Soon-Ki Hong

Summary

This study measured microplastic concentrations in the inflow and discharge of four sewage treatment plants in South Korea and found that treatment processes removed some microplastics but not all. The facilities were identified as potential point sources of microplastic discharge into nearby rivers. The findings support the need for upgraded treatment technologies that specifically target microplastic removal from municipal wastewater.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics from sewage and wastewater treatment facilities can be discharged into rivers and oceans, and the treatment facilities themselves can be a point source of microplastic pollution. The microplastic detection status and methods were compared in Miwon, Cheongju, Jecheon, and Chungju sewage treatment facilities in Chungcheongbuk-do. Samples were collected from the inlet, filtration facility, and discharge of Miwon Sewage Treatment Facility, a Porous Substrate Bioreactor (PSBR) construction corporation. Additionally, the inlet, first settling tank, final settling tank and outlet samples were taken from three sewage treatment facilities (Cheongju, Jecheon, and Chungju), which use bioreactor transformation processes. In the results, raw water showed a range of 232-1,510 pieces/L, and effluent water showed a range of 0.7-6.7 pieces/L. All four sewage treatment facilities showed high treatment efficiency of 98.5-99.9%. The treatment processes showed high removal efficiency in the order of CNR (97.0%) > PSBR (95.9%) > NPR (91.5%) > SMART3 (70.3%). As a study was conducted on only one sewage treatment facility for each process, additional research is necessary.

Share this paper