0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Nationwide evaluation of microplastic properties in municipal wastewater treatment plants in South Korea

Environmental Pollution 2024 23 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jae-Ho Lee, So-Jeong Cheon, Changsoo Kim, Soo-Hyun Joo, Ki–In Choi, Dong-Hwan Jeong, Soo-Hyung Lee, Jeong‐Ki Yoon

Summary

Researchers evaluated microplastic levels at 22 municipal wastewater treatment plants across South Korea and found that while the plants remove over 99% of microplastics, the sheer volume of treated water still releases significant quantities into receiving waterways. Most removal happened during the sedimentation stage, and the most common microplastic types found were fragments and fibers under 300 micrometers. The study suggests that despite high removal efficiency, wastewater treatment plants remain an important source of microplastic discharge into the environment.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are considered a significant microplastic discharge source. To evaluate the amount and characteristics of microplastics discharged from WWTPs in South Korea, we selected 22 municipal WWTPs nationally and investigated microplastics at each treatment stage. The mean microplastic removal efficiency by WWTPs was >99%, and most of the microplastics were removed by sedimentation with the second clarifier during wastewater treatment. Consequently, the microplastic removal efficiency of WWTPs did not significantly differ from that of the adopted wastewater treatment technology because a second clarifier was applied in most WWTPs. However, for WWTPs operating a tertiary treatment process, the removal efficiency was enhanced compared with that of WWTPs discharging after a second clarifier. Although the microplastic removal efficiency was high by WWTP, the discharge contribution to the water environment could not be ignored because of the amount of treated wastewater, resulting in an increase of 5.8-270.9 items/m of microplastics in the receiving water. The characteristics of microplastics in WWTPs, including their components, shape, and size, were also evaluated. The most detected components included polytetrafluoroethylene and polyester. Most microplastics detected were categorized as fragments and fibers, while other types were hardly detected. The size of more than 70% of the microplastics detected in WWTPs was under 300 μm, implying that the size of microplastics required to control in WWTPs was much smaller than the defined size of microplastics. An evaluation of the correlation between other pollution factors and microplastic abundance did not reveal positive correlations, and microplastic occurrence was not affected by changing seasons, which may need to be evaluated with further studies. Research should also be performed on the effect of influent sources on the level of microplastic abundance and fate of ultrafine plastics in WWTPs.

Share this paper