0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Investigating the impact of PVC microplastics on membrane fouling behavior in MBR for enhanced wastewater treatment efficiency

Scientific Reports 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fatemeh Nasiri, Hossein Hazrati, Soorena Gharibian

Summary

Researchers added PVC microparticles to a membrane bioreactor treating simulated urban wastewater and found that the microplastics unexpectedly improved COD removal from 84.76% to 92.48% while reducing membrane fouling rates, though effects on sludge and microbial communities require further investigation.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Studies show membrane bioreactor (MBRs) remove microplastics (MPs) effectively, yet their impacts on fouling, sludge, and microbes remain unclear. Findings vary, few investigations exist, and simplified conditions restrict applicability, highlighting the need for more robust, realistic research on wastewater treatment systems. In this study, the effect of MPs on MBR treating simulated urban wastewater was investigated by evaluating chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal and membrane fouling by adding polyvinyl chloride microparticles (PVC-MPs) into synthetic feed wastewater. The average particle size of MPs was 6.69 ± 4.2 µm. At steady state, the COD removal was 84.76 ± 4.27% and 92.48 ± 5.62% for MBR and MPs-MBR, respectively. The presence of MPs in the MBR led to a ca. 16 and 35% reduction in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) content of the sludge cake layer, respectively. Furthermore, the average permeate flux of the MPs-MBR was 48% higher, which was attributed to the properties of the sludge. The presence of MPs had no adverse effect on sludge settleability. The total membrane fouling resistance in the MPs-MBR was lower (1.85 × 1012 1/m) than MBR (3.21 × 1012 1/m). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micro images confirmed the presence of fewer fouling agents on the fouling layer of the MPs-MBR. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy analyses confirmed the lower intensity of proteins/carbohydrates functional groups in the cake layer of MPs-MBR, and no functional groups related to PVC-MPs were detected in the effluent from the MPs-MBR. Overall, it can be concluded that MPs were effectively retained by the membrane without adverse effect on membrane fouling behaviour.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Performance evaluation of MBR in treating microplastics polyvinylchloride contaminated polluted surface water

Researchers evaluated a membrane bioreactor (MBR) for treating surface water spiked with polyvinylchloride microplastics at 10 particles/L, finding it achieved over 80% removal of organic matter and 95% ammonia removal, though microplastic addition initially inhibited performance before recovery within days. The study found that PVC microplastics increased irreversible membrane fouling, with the membrane module and bio-carrier adsorption being the main rejection mechanisms.

Article Tier 2

Effects of microplastics accumulation on performance of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment

Researchers simulated the long-term accumulation of polypropylene microplastics in membrane bioreactors used for wastewater treatment. They found that while microplastic accumulation did not reduce the removal of key pollutants like COD and ammonia nitrogen, it did increase membrane fouling and alter the composition of microbial communities in the reactor. The study suggests that microplastic buildup in wastewater treatment systems may affect operational efficiency over time.

Article Tier 2

Fouling behavior of nano/microplastics and COD, TOC, and TN removal in MBR: A comparative study

This study tested a membrane bioreactor (MBR) — a combination of biological treatment and membrane filtration used in wastewater plants — for its ability to remove nano- and microplastics from wastewater. The system achieved 99.4% removal of organic pollutants and complete removal of nanoplastics, and found that more hydrophilic membranes were better at capturing microplastics. The study also examined how microplastics foul and clog membranes over time, which is a practical challenge for wastewater treatment operations. These results support MBRs as a promising technology for reducing microplastic discharges from treatment plants into waterways.

Article Tier 2

Exploring the effects of polyethylene and polyester microplastics on biofilm formation, membrane Fouling, and microbial communities in Modified Ludzack-Ettinger-Reciprocation membrane bioreactors

Researchers investigated how polyethylene pellets and polyester fibers affect membrane bioreactor performance in wastewater treatment. They found that PE pellets increased membrane fouling rates 2-3 times faster, while polyester fibers reduced nitrate removal efficiency from 99.6% to 90.9% and decreased beneficial denitrifying bacteria. The study also found that microplastics in treatment systems can harbor pathogens and alter microbial community structures.

Article Tier 2

Recent advances on micro/nanoplastic pollution and membrane fouling during water treatment: A review

Researchers reviewed recent advances in understanding how micro- and nanoplastics contribute to membrane fouling during water treatment processes. The study found that while membrane separation effectively removes microplastics from wastewater effluent, fouling caused by plastic particles along with dissolved organics and extracellular polymers remains a key obstacle, and understanding the fouling mechanisms is critical for improving treatment efficiency.

Share this paper