0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

The Disadvantageof Having a Big Mouth: The Relationshipbetween Insect Body Size and Microplastic Ingestion

Figshare 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marshall W. Ritchie (12529855), Emily R. McColville (20311735), Jennie E. Mills (22765532), Jennifer F. Provencher (8276022), Susan M. Bertram (8136678), Heath A. MacMillan (12529864)

Summary

Researchers investigated the relationship between insect body size and microplastic ingestion, finding that larger mouth openings increase exposure to bigger plastic particles while insects also physically fragment larger microplastics into nanoplastics. The study highlights insects as both vectors of microplastic transfer through food webs and active contributors to nanoplastic generation in terrestrial environments.

Polymers

Plastic pollution is ubiquitous. When plastics enter natural environments, they break down into microplastics (MPs; <5 mm), becoming more accessible to smaller animals. Insects ingesting plastics in the wild can physically degrade larger MPs into smaller MPs and nanoplastics. While particle size and body size undoubtedly impact plastic ingestion and degradation, we have no predictive understanding of how these factors interact. We studied how a model cricket species (Gryllodes sigillatus) interacts with plastics of differing sizes throughout a 20-fold change in body mass during growth and development. We fed crickets differently sized polyethylene MPs to first investigate whether crickets would avoid MPs when given a choice. We found that they do not. Instead, they gradually began to consume more of the plastic diet over time. Crickets would only consume beads when their mouth size was larger than the MP. While small MPs (e.g., 38 μm) were more likely to be excreted whole, larger MPs (e.g., 425 μm) were more extensively biofragmented if ingested. These effects of insect behavior and body size on the likelihood of plastic ingestion and the degree to which MPs are degraded have important implications for how and when we should regulate size classes of plastic particles entering natural environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The Disadvantageof Having a Big Mouth: The Relationshipbetween Insect Body Size and Microplastic Ingestion

Researchers investigated the relationship between insect body size and microplastic ingestion, finding that larger mouth openings increase exposure to bigger plastic particles while insects also physically fragment larger microplastics into nanoplastics. The study highlights insects as both vectors of microplastic transfer through food webs and active contributors to nanoplastic generation in terrestrial environments.

Article Tier 2

The Disadvantage of Having a Big Mouth: The Relationship between Insect Body Size and Microplastic Ingestion

Researchers explored the relationship between an animal's mouth size and its ingestion of microplastics, finding that species with larger mouths tended to consume more plastic particles inadvertently while feeding. This has implications for understanding which wildlife species face the greatest microplastic exposure risk.

Article Tier 2

The disadvantage of having a big mouth: the relationship between insect body size and microplastic ingestion

Researchers studied how crickets of different sizes interact with microplastic particles of different sizes throughout their growth, finding that crickets only ingest microplastics when the particle is small enough to fit in their mouth whole. Crucially, once eaten, larger particles were more extensively broken down inside the cricket's gut — meaning insects can physically fragment microplastics into even smaller, potentially more harmful nanoplastics. The crickets showed no avoidance behavior toward plastic, readily consuming it when it fit. This research has important implications for understanding how microplastics move through food webs and get broken into more dangerous size ranges.

Article Tier 2

The digestive system of a cricket pulverizes polyethylene microplastics down to the nanoplastic scale

This study found that crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) physically ground ingested polyethylene microplastics down to nanoplastic-scale particles through their digestive processes, a finding with implications for how insects contribute to nanoplastic generation and dispersal in terrestrial ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Ingestion and excretion dynamics of microplastics by black soldier fly larvae and correlation with mouth opening size

Researchers examined how black soldier fly larvae ingest and excrete microplastics, finding that particle ingestion and excretion dynamics correlate with mouth opening size, raising food safety concerns for larvae used as animal feed.

Share this paper