0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Transport and retention of laundry microplastic fibres in slow sand filtration systems

Scientific Reports 2026
Fan Gao, Rosa Busquets, Luiza C. Campos

Summary

Slow sand filtration — one of the most energy-efficient water treatment methods — was tested for its ability to remove laundry-derived microplastic fibers from washing machine effluent, with results showing 92–95% removal at the lowest flow rate tested. Fine sand filters slightly outperformed coarse sand, and the top layer of the filter did most of the work. Given that laundry wastewater is a major source of microplastic fiber pollution entering waterways, these results support slow sand filtration as a practical, low-cost add-on treatment to prevent fiber release.

Study Type Environmental

This study investigates the transport and retention of microplastic fibres (MFs) in slow sand filtration (SSF) systems using coarse and fine sand media under varying flow conditions. SSF is one of the most energy-efficient and cost-effective tertiary treatment methods. This study examined the performance of SSF for treating washing machine effluents heavily contaminated with MFs, such as those from washing machine discharge. Fine sand filters (with effective grain size of 0.2 mm) consistently retained significantly fewer MFs in the effluent than coarse sand filters (with an effective grain size of 0.6 mm), by a factor of 1.3 ± 0.2, with retention occurring predominantly within the upper 0-10 cm of the filter bed, highlighting the dominant role of the surface layer in MF capture. Between 83.9% and 93.6% of MFs in the filter effluents were 10-50 μm in length, with 10-20 μm fibres forming the dominant fraction across filtration rates of 5, 10, and 20 cm/h. Increasing filtration rate promoted deeper MF penetration into the filter bed, reduced overall retention, and increased MF breakthrough. Dissolved organic carbon removal was slightly higher in fine sand filters than in coarse sand filters, and effluent pH increased modestly with longer retention times. The highest MF removal efficiencies were achieved at the lowest filtration rate (5 cm/h), where removal reached 92.0% and 95.0% for coarse and fine sand, respectively. These trends are consistent with a mechanistic interpretation in which MF transport and retention are governed by interception, straining, and limited diffusion within the porous media, rather than simple size exclusion. SSF therefore represents a promising low-energy treatment option for mitigating MF release from wastewater effluents, particularly for fibres larger than 10 μm.

Share this paper