0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage

PLoS ONE 2020 17 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Macarena Ros, Emma L. Johnston Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Mark A. Oakley Browne, Emma L. Johnston Emma L. Johnston Emma L. Johnston Macarena Ros, Emma L. Johnston

Summary

This study tested whether washing machine filters could meaningfully reduce the emission of synthetic textile fibers into sewage. Results showed filter effectiveness varied significantly by pore size and fiber type, and current consumer filters did not eliminate fiber emissions, suggesting they are insufficient as a standalone solution for microplastic pollution from laundry.

When clothes are worn and washed, they emit fibres into the ecosystem via discharges of sewage that have been linked to the global dispersion of clothing fibres. Facilities that treat sewage divert some fibres from sewage effluent to sludge, but no current methods of filtration eliminate their environmental release. While filters for washing-machines are sold to consumers with the argument they will reduce the emissions of fibres from clothes to the environment, there is insufficient scientific peer-reviewed evidence assessing their ability to retain fibres from washed clothes and reduce environmental contamination. To improve our understanding and develop more realistic methods to assess the efficiency of filters, we washed replicate cotton and polyester garments in replicate domestic front-loaded washing-machines with and without replicate filters (micro- and milli-meter-sized pores), and then quantified the masses of the fibres retained by the filters and those released in the effluent. Here we show micrometer-sized filters significantly reduced the mass of cotton by 67% (F2,6 = 11.69, P<0.01) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters, whilst filters in general reduced polyester fibres in their effluent by more than 65% (micrometer-sized pores) and 74% (millimeter-sized pores) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters (F2,12 = 5.20, P<0.05). While filters with micrometer-sized pores caught larger masses and total proportions of fibres than filters with millimeter-sized pores, the differences were only significant for the total proportions of cotton (t = 4.799 df = 4, P<0.01). For tests with garments of either types of polymer, the filtered effluent still contained up to a third of the original masses of fibres released from the garments. Given the diversity of clothes, polymers, appliances and filters currently sold to consumers, our work shows the value of increasing the rigour (e.g. more levels of replication) when testing filters and the need for further studies that test an even greater diversity of materials and methods in order to meet the growing demand for knowledge from governments, industry and the public.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper