We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative Distribution of Microplastics in Different Inland Aquatic Ecosystems
Summary
Researchers sampled seven Greek inland aquatic ecosystems of varying types and found microplastics in all locations, with fibers dominating (0.47–149.4 items/m³) and higher concentrations in vertical than surface samples, indicating that morphology, trophic status, and anthropogenic pressure influence distribution.
The widespread dispersion of microplastics (MPs) has been recognized as a pervasive and persistent environmental contaminant in worldwide freshwater ecosystems, and although relative studies have skyrocketed, there are still significant knowledge gaps in areas like southern Europe. This study assesses the microplastic pollution in seven Greek inland aquatic ecosystems which vary in morphology, trophic status, and anthropogenic pressure. Surface and vertical samples were taken with 200 μm plankton nets. MPs were present in all samples, with fibers being the dominant form, having an abundance range between 0.47 and 149.4 items/m3 with fragments between 0.08 and 9.17 items/m3. Fibers and fragments had greater abundance in the vertical than in the surface samples. There were no significant abundance differences between lakes and lagoons, and among the sampling sites in each ecosystem. Blue and transparent were the colors that prevailed, and most of the fibers and fragments were smaller than 1 mm. Four types of MPs were recorded, with PET (polyethylene terephthalate) being the most frequent. The use of the novel Relative Anthropogenic Pressure (RAP) index resulted in positive correlations between certain sociological parameters and the microplastics’ abundance, efficiently reflecting the impingement of human populations on the inland aquatic ecosystems.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Comparative Distribution of Microplastics in Different Inland Aquatic Ecosystems
Researchers surveyed microplastic pollution in seven Greek inland water bodies differing in morphology and human impact, finding microplastics (predominantly fibers) in all samples with abundances from 0.60 particles/m³, highlighting contamination even in less impacted freshwater systems.
Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Characterization of Microplastic Pollution in The Three Main Freshwater Systems (Aksu and Köprü Streams, Manavgat River) And Fishing Grounds Located in Their Vicinities in The Antalya Bay
Researchers found 2,444 microplastics across three freshwater systems near Antalya Bay, Turkey, with fibers (57%) and fragments (33%) dominating, and polyethylene and polypropylene as the most common polymers, showing a homogeneous pollution pattern across all sampling sites.
Microplastics Across Interconnected Aquatic Matrices: A Comparative Study of Marine, Riverine, and Wastewater Matrices in Northern Greece
Researchers studied tiny plastic particles (microplastics) in seawater, rivers, and wastewater treatment plants in Northern Greece to see how much plastic pollution exists in the region's water systems. They developed a reliable method to measure these microscopic plastic pieces, which can enter our food chain through seafood and drinking water. This baseline data will help authorities track plastic pollution levels and develop strategies to reduce microplastics in water that could eventually affect human health.
Microplastics Across Interconnected Aquatic Matrices: A Comparative Study of Marine, Riverine, and Wastewater Matrices in Northern Greece
Scientists studied tiny plastic particles (microplastics) in seawater, rivers, and wastewater treatment plants in Northern Greece to understand how much plastic pollution exists in the region's water systems. They developed a reliable method to measure these microscopic plastic pieces and established baseline pollution levels that can help authorities create better strategies to reduce plastic contamination. This matters because microplastics can enter our drinking water and food chain, and understanding where they're most concentrated helps protect both environmental and human health.
Effects of environmental and anthropogenic factors on the distribution and abundance of microplastics in freshwater ecosystems
Researchers reviewed nearly 6,500 articles to identify the environmental and human factors driving microplastic distribution in freshwater ecosystems worldwide. They found that both natural factors like water flow and temperature, and human activities like urbanization and agriculture, significantly influence where microplastics accumulate in rivers and lakes. The study provides a framework for predicting microplastic pollution hotspots and prioritizing monitoring efforts in freshwater systems.